Comparison of clinical and pharmacodynamic features of proton pump inhibitors efficacy in gastroesophageal reflux disease
Abstract
The aim of review. To present literature data on clinical presentation, pharmacodynamic and economic efficiency of standard dozes of proton pump inhibitors (PPI) for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).
Summary. PPI are the most effective pharmaceuticals for treatment of acid-related diseases (ARD). Control of intragastric рН level is the key moment of healing of erosions and ulcers of the upper gastro-intestinal tract, as well as for Н. рylori eradication efficacy. Functional state of stomach mucosa and efficacy of antisecretory therapy was estimated by 24-hour pH or рН-impedance measurement. The standard dozes of PPI provided acid-suppressive effect for up to 18 hs. Already after the first dose intake at 24-hour рН monitoring the stomach рН>3 was recorded for 56,1% (±20,94) of total monitoring time, and рН>4 — for 44,0% (±18,72), that promoted rapid symptom relief. Terms of activation and efficacy of Н+/К+-ATPase inhibitors is determined by pH of the media and pKa values for each pharmaceutical. Intensity of acid-suppressive action of PPI depends on drug metabolic pathways and genetically determined features of cytochrome P450 system. Mutations of CYP2C19 alleles allow to divide the studied patients population into groups of rapid, mediun and slow «metabolizers» that it is necessary to take into account at prescription of the certain drug. At a choice of PPI dose or shift from one PPI to another it is necessary to be guided by the concept of equivalent dosages according to the instruction leaflet on the drug application. Long-term maintenance therapy by PPI for GERD enables reduction of expenses for treatment of disease preserving clinical efficacy.
Conclusion. PPI are of the drugs of choice in ARD therapy. PPI should be applied in the least effective doze, including on demand treatment and intermittent treatment. The individual approach to PPI prescription, based on the careful analysis of clinical presentation, as well as on data of esophagogastroduodenoscopy, 24-hour pH or pH plus impedance measurement is required. Reasonable cost to efficacy ratio is no less important.
About the Authors
O. A. StoronovaRussian Federation
Storonova Olga A — MD, doctor of functional diagnostics department, Vasilenko Clinic of internal diseases propedeutics, gastroenterology and hepatology
119991, Moscow, Pogodinskaya street, 1, bld 1.
A. S. Trukhmanov
Russian Federation
References
1. . Ивашкин В.Т., Маев И.В., Трухманов А.С. Пищевод Баррета. В 2 т. М.: Изд-во «Шико», 2011. 608, 624 с.
2. Ивашкин В.Т., Маев И.В., Трухманов А.С., Баранская Е.К., Дронова О.Б., Зайратьянц О.В., Пасечников В.Д., Сайфутдинов Р.Г., Шептулин А.А., Кучерявый Ю.А., Лапина Т.Л., Сторонова О.А., Кайбышева В.О. Гастроэзофагеальная рефлюксная болезнь. Клинические рекомендации. Российская гастроэнтерологическая ассоциация. М., 2014. 23 с.
3. Ивашкин В.Т., Трухманов А.С., Кардашева С.С., Сторонова О.А. Париет в лечении гастроэзофагеальной рефлюксной болезни. Профилактика и лечение хронических заболеваний верхних отделов желудочно-кишечного тракта / Под ред. В.Т. Ивашкина. М.: МЕДпрессинформ, 2014. 176 с.
4. Кайбышева В.О., Сторонова О.А., Трухманов А.С., Ивашкин В.Т. Возможности внутрипищеводной рН-импедансометрии в диагностике ГЭРБ. Рос журн гастроэнтерол гепатол колопроктол 2013; 23(2):4-16.
5. Маев И.В., Трухманов А.С. Клинико-функциональная оценка эффективности применения рабепразола, омепразола и эзомепразола у больных неэрозивной рефлюксной болезнью, ассоциированной с бронхиальной астмой. Рос журн гастроэнтерол гепатол колопроктол 2004; 14(5):22-9.
6. Надинская М.Ю. Рабепразол (париет) в лечении гастроэзофагеальной рефлюксной болезни с позиции медицины, основанной на научных доказательствах. Рос журн гастроэнтерол гепатол колопроктол 2004; 14(1):2-12.
7. Пасечников В.Д. Ключи к выбору оптимального ингибитора протонной помпы для терапии кислотозависимых заболеваний. Рос журн гастроэнтерол гепатол колопроктол 2004; 14(3):32-9.
8. Сторонова О.А., Трухманов А.С. Практическому врачу о продолжительной интрагастральной рН-метрии: Пособие для врачей. 2-е изд. / Под ред. В.Т. Ивашкина. М., 2015. 16 с.
9. Сторонова О.А., Трухманов А.С., Ивашкин В.Т. Роль защитных факторов слизистой оболочки пищевода в лечении гастроэзофагеальной рефлюксной болезни. Клин перспективы гастроэнтерол гепатол 2014; 5:37-42.
10. Трухманов А.С., Джахая Н.Л., Кайбышева В.О., Сторонова О.А. Новые аспекты рекомендаций по лечению больных гастроэзофагеальной рефлюксной болезнью. Гастроэнтерол гепатол: новости, мнения, обучение 2013; 1(4):2-9.
11. Baisley K., Tejura В., Morocutti A., et al. Rabeprazole 10 mg is equivalent to esomeprazole 20 mg in control of gastric pH in healthy volunteers. Clin J Gastroenterol 2001; 96(Suppl):48-148.
12. Bredenoord A.J. Impedance-pH monitoring: new standard for measuring gastro-esophageal reflux. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2008; 20(5):434-9.
13. Dean B.B., Siddique R.M., Yamashita B.D., et al.
14. Cost-effectiveness of proton-pump inhibitors for maintenance therapv of erosive reflux esophagitis. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2001; 58(14):1338-46.
15. Eggleston A., Katelaris P., Nandurkar S., Thorpe P., Holtmann G. Clinical trial: the treatment of gastro-esophageal reflux disease in primary care – prospective randomized comparison of rabeprazole 20 mg with esomeprazole 20 and 40 mg. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2009; 29, 967-78.
16. Fock K.M., Teo E.K., Ang T.L., Chua T.S., Ng T.M.,
17. Tan Y.L. Rabeprazole vs esomeprazole in non-erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease: A randomized, doubleblind study in urban Asia. World J Gastroenterol 2005; 11(20):3091-8.
18. Furuta T., Sugimoto M., Shirai N. Individualized Therapy for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease. Potential Impact of Pharmacogenetic Testing based on CYP2C19. Mol Diagn Ther 2012; 16(4):223-37.
19. Gralnek I.M., Dulai G.S., Fennerty M.B., Spiegel B.M. Esomeprazole versus other proton pump inhibitors in erosive esophagitis: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006; 4:1452-8.
20. Hank S. Wang, David S. Oh, Ariana Anderson, Jose Nieto J., Phuong Tient, Joseph R. Pisegna. Comparative efficacy of rabeprazole and pantoprazole in the control of nocturnal acid output and intragastric acidity. Gut Liver 2008; 2:30-8.
21. Hughes A., Bodger K., Bytzer P., Dirk de Herdt, Dubois D. Economic analysis of on-demand maintenance therapy with proton pump inhibitors in patients with non-erosive reflux disease. Pharmacoeconomics 2005; 23(10):1031-41.
22. Jin-Yan Luo, Chun-Yan Niu, Xue-Qin Wang, You-Ling Zhu, Jun Gong. Effect of a single oral dose of rabeprazole on nocturnal acid breakthrough and nocturnal alkaline amplitude. World J Gastroenterol 2003; 9(11):2583-6.
23. Kirchheiner J., Glatt S., Fuhr U., Klotz U., Meineke I., Seufferlein T., Brockmöller J. Relative potency of proton-pump inhibitors-comparison of effects on intragastric pH. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2009; 65:19-31.
24. Кlotz U. Proton pump inhibitorstheir pharmacological impact in the clinical management of acid-related disorders. Arzneimittelforschung 2009; 59(6):271-82.
25. Kromer W., Kruger U., Huber R., Hortmann M., Steinijans V.W. Differences in pH-depended activation rates of substituted benzimidazoles and biological in vitro correlations. Pharmacology 1998; 56(2):57-70.
26. Miner P., Delemosf B., Xiangf J., Lococof J., Ienit J. Effects of a single dose of rabeprazole 20 mg and pantoprazole 40 mg on 24-h intragastric acidity and esophageal acid exposure: a randomized study in gastroesophageal reflux disease patients with a history of nocturnal heartburn. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2010; 31:991-1000.
27. Mitsushige Sugimoto, et al. Comparison of acid inhibition with standard dosages of proton pump inhibitors in relation to CYP2C19 genotype in Japanese. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2014; 70:1073-8.
28. Pantoflickova D., Dorta G., Rauic M., et al. Acid inhibition on the first day of dosing: comparison of four proton pump inhibitors. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2003; 17:1507-14.
29. Pilotto A., Franceschi M., Leandro G., Scarcelli, et al.
30. Comparison of four proton pump inhibitors for the shortterm treatment of esophagitis in elderly patients. World J Gastroenterol 2007; 13(33):4467-72.
31. Ribolsi M., Savarino E., de Bortoli N., Balestrieri P., Furnari M., Martinucci I., Casale M., Greco F., Salvinelli F., Savarino V., Marchi S., Cicala M. Reflux pattern and role of impedance-pH variables in predicting PPI response in patients with suspected GERD-related chronic cough. Abstracts of the 20th National Congress of Digestive Diseases. Dig Liver Dis 2014; 46:1-144.
32. Shi S., Klotz U. Proton pump inhibitors: an update of their clinical use and pharmacokinetics. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2008; 64(10):935-51.
33. Shin J.M., Kim N. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the proton pump inhibitors. J Neurogastroenterol Motil 2013; 19(1):25-35.
34. Sifrim D., Castell D., Dent J., Kahrilas P.J. Gastroesophageal reflux monitoring: review and consensus report on detection and definitions of acid, non-acid, and gas reflux. Gut 2004; 53:1024-31.
35. Sim S.C., Risinger C., Dahl M.L., et al. A common novel CYP2C19 gene variant causes ultrarapid drug metabolism relevant for the drug response to proton pump inhibitors and antidepressants. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2006; 79(1):103-13.
36. Stedman C.A., Barclay M.L. Review article: comparison of the pharmacokinetics, acid suppression and efficacy of proton pump inhibitors. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2000; 14:963-78.
37. Sugimoto M., Shirai N., Nishino M., Kodaira C., Uotani T., Sahara S., Ichikawa H., Kagami T., Sugimoto K., Furuta T. Comparison of acid inhibition with standard dosages of proton pump inhibitors in relation to CYP2C19 genotype in Japanese. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2014; 70:1073-8.
38. Tutuian R., Castell D.O. Review article: complete gastro-esophageal reflux monitoring combined pH and impedance. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2006; 24(Suppl. 2):2737.
39. Warrington S., Baisley K., Dunn K., Boyce M., Morocutti A. Effects of single doses of rabeprazole 20 mg and esomeprazole 40 mg on 24-h intragastric pH in healthy subjects. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2006; 62:685-91.
40. Warrington S., Baisley K., Lee D., Lomax K., Delemos D., Boyce M., Morocutti A. Pharmacodynamic effects of single doses of rabeprazole 20 mg and pantoprazole 40 mg in patients with GERD and nocturnal heartburn. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2007; 25:511-7.
41. Zhy Hai-di, Wang Xeng, Xia Xian-ming, Xu shu-man, Lan Yao. Rabeprazole 10 mg versus 20 mg in preventing relapse of gastroesophageal reflux disease a metaanalysis. Clin Med J 2013; 126(16).
Review
For citations:
Storonova O.A., Trukhmanov A.S. Comparison of clinical and pharmacodynamic features of proton pump inhibitors efficacy in gastroesophageal reflux disease. Russian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Coloproctology. 2015;25(6):82-91. (In Russ.)