Preview

Russian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Coloproctology

Advanced search

Efficacy of combined colorectal cancer treatment in senile patients

https://doi.org/10.22416/1382-4376-2017-27-1-101-112

Abstract

Aim of investigation.To estimate efficacy of combined treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC) in senile patients, to determine risk factors for postsurgical complications and evaluate postoperative mortality. Material and methods. The retrospective and prospective analysis of primary CRC patients, who were operated in The First Sechenov Moscow State Medical University and Petrovsky National Research Center of Surgery in April, 2006 to May, 2014 was carried out. Overall 122 patients with CRC of the II-IV stage of senile age were selected, whose mean age was 79 (75-95) years. Preoperative comorbidity assessment and perioperative complications risk were assessed by Charlson comorbidity index and ASA physical status classification system. Cr-POSSUM scoring system was applied to predict postoperative (30-day) mortality. Overall and cancer-specific survival rate were assessed taking into account comorbidity of patients and prescribed adjuvant therapy. Results. The average Charlson score taking into account age of the patient was 7.6±2.4. Forty seven patients (39%) were classified as ASA≥3. The predicted postoperative motility (Cr-POSSUM) was 13.2%. In 106 (87%) patients colon or rectum resection with formation of primary interintestinal anastomosis and D3 lymph node dissection, at 11 (9%) - abdominal and perineal rectum extirpation is executed, 5 patients had obstructive Hartmann operation. Patients with the IV stage of CRC underwent standard volume surgery with high-grade lymph node dissection due to the high risk of obstruction or tumor bleeding. Achieved 30-day postoperative mortality was 4.9%, overall 5-year survival rate - 67.3±5.6%, cancer-specific survival - 70.1±4.4%. In group of patients with III and IV stages of CRC who received postoperative adjuvant therapy, the tendency to higher total survival was noted, however only cancer-specific survival scores had statistically significant differences in this subgroup. Conclusions. Multidisciplinary approach to CRC treatment provides achievement of satisfactory postoperative mortality in senile patients (4.9% versus predicted 13.2%) along with satisfactory total and cancer-specific 5-year survival rate. Postoperative adjuvant therapy significantly improves treatment results for third stage CRC, however the objective indications for adjuvant therapy are yet to be established. Due to complex drugto-drug interactions specificity of metabolism and biological tumor properties, cross-reactions of concomitant diseases in senile patients each step of combined treatment should be discussed at multidisciplinary consultation.

About the Authors

P. V. Tsarkov
The State Education Institution of Higher Professional Training The First Sechenov Moscow State Medical University
Russian Federation


D. R. Markaryan
The State Education Institution of Higher Professional Training The First Sechenov Moscow State Medical University
Russian Federation


V. M. Nekoval
The State Education Institution of Higher Professional Training The First Sechenov Moscow State Medical University
Russian Federation


References

1. Каприн А. Д., Старинский В. В., Петрова Г. В. Состояние онкологической помощи населению России. Редакционно-издательский совет МНИОИ им. П. А. Герцена; 2015. 236 с.

2. Каприн А. Д., Старинский В. В., Петрова Г.В. Злокачественные новообразования в России в 2013 году (заболеваемость и смертность). Редакционноиздательский совет МНИОИ им. П. А. Герцена; 2015. 250 с.

3. McCleary N.J., Dotan E., Browner I. Refining the chemotherapy approach for older patients with colon cancer. J Clin Oncol 2014; 32(24):2570-80.

4. Давыдов М. И., Аксель Е. М. Статистика злокачественных новообразований в России и странах СНГ в 2004 г. Вестник РОНЦ им. Н. Н. Блохина РАМН 2006; 17(3):226 с.

5. Давыдов М. И., Аксель Е. М. Статистика злокачественных новообразований в России и странах СНГ в 2007 г. Вестник РОНЦ им. Н. Н. Блохина РАМН 2009; 20(3):230 с.

6. Scher K. S., Hurria A. Under-representation of older adults in cancer registration trials: known problem, little progress. J Clin Oncol 2012; 30(17):2036-8.

7. Sorbye H., Cvancarova M., Qvortrup C., Pfeiffer P. et al. Age-dependent improvement in median and long-term survival in unselected population-based Nordic registries of patients with synchronous metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol 2013; 24(9):2354-60.

8. Sanoff H.K., Goldberg R.M. Colorectal cancer treatment in older patients. Gastrointest Cancer Res 2007; 1(6):248-53.

9. Van den Broek C. B. et al. The survival gap between middle-aged and elderly colon cancer patients. Time trends in treatment and survival. Eur J Surg Oncol 2011; 37(10):904-12.

10. Dekker J. W., van den Broek C. B., Bastiaannet E., van den Geest L. G. et al. Importance of the first postoperative year in the prognosis of elderly colorectal cancer patients. Ann Surg Oncol 2011; 18(6):1533-9.

11. Thiels C. A., Bergquist J. R., Meyers A. J., Johnson C. L. et al. Outcomes with multimodal therapy for elderly patients with rectal cancer. Br J Surg 2016; 103(2):10614.

12. Tsarkov P. V., Nikoda V. V., Stamov V. I., Markar’ian D.R. et al. The efficacy of the multidisciplinary approach in colorectal cancer surgery in elderly patients. Khirurgia 2012; 2:4-13.

13. Van Steenbergen L. N., Elferink M. A., Krijnen P., Lemmens V. E. et al. Improved survival of colon cancer due to improved treatment and detection: a nationwide population-based study in The Netherlands 1989-2006. Ann Oncol 2010; 21(11):2206-12.

14. Braendegaard Winther S., Baatrup G., Pfeiffer P., Qvortrup C. et al. Trends in colorectal cancer in the elderly in Denmark, 1980-2012. Acta Oncol 2016; 55(1):29-39.

15. Quipourt V. et al. Comorbidities alone do not explain the undertreatment of colorectal cancer in older adults: a French population-based study. J Am Geriatr Soc 2011; 59(4):694-8.

16. Kahn K. L., Adams J. L., Weeks J. C., Chrischilles E. A. et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy use and adverse events among older patients with stage III colon cancer. JAMA 2010; 303(11):1037-45.

17. Abrams T. A., Brightly R., Mao J., Kirkner G. et al. Patterns of adjuvant chemotherapy use in a populationbased cohort of patients with resected stage II or III colon cancer. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29(24):3255-62.

18. Dobie S. A., Laura-Mae Baldwin, Jason A. Dominitz. Completion of therapy by Medicare patients with stage III colon cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2006; 98(9):610-9.

19. Дмитриев М. О. Хирургическое лечение осложненного колоректального рака у лиц пожилого и старческого возраста: Автореф. дис. … канд. мед. наук. Владивосток; 2007.

20. Карпенко В. В. Возможности хирургического метода в медицинской реабилитации пожилых больных при осложненном раке толстой кишки: Автореф. дис. … канд. мед. наук. Ростов-на-Дону; 2007.

21. Engstrom P. F. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: colon cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2009; 7(8):778-831.

22. Audisio R. A., Ramesh H. S., Gennari R., van Leeuwen B. L. et al. Shall we operate? Preoperative assessment in elderly cancer patients (PACE) can help. A SIOG surgical task force prospective study. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2008; 65(2): 156-63.

23. Papamichael D., Audisio R., Horiot J. C., Glimelius B. et al. Treatment of the elderly colorectal cancer patient: SIOG expert recommendations. Ann Oncol 2009; 20(1):516.

24. Bromage S. J., Cunliffe W. J. Validation of the CR-POSSUM risk-adjusted scoring system for major colorectal cancer surgery in a single center. Dis Colon Rectum 2007; 50(2):192-6.

25. Horzic M., Kopljar M., Cupurdija K., Bielen D. V. et al. Comparison of P-POSSUM and Cr-POSSUM scores in patients undergoing colorectal cancer resection. Arch Surg 2007; 142(11):1043-8.

26. Audisio R. A. Tailoring surgery to elderly patients with cancer. Br J Surg 2016; 103(2):10-1.


Review

For citations:


Tsarkov P.V., Markaryan D.R., Nekoval V.M. Efficacy of combined colorectal cancer treatment in senile patients. Russian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Coloproctology. 2017;27(1):101-112. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22416/1382-4376-2017-27-1-101-112

Views: 1006


ISSN 1382-4376 (Print)
ISSN 2658-6673 (Online)