Preview

Russian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Coloproctology

Advanced search

Outcomes Following Observation of Small Non-Functioning Neuroendocrine Tumors of the Pancreas. Data from the Registry of the Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Center

https://doi.org/10.22416/1382-4376-2025-35-2-83-94

Abstract

Aim: to evaluate results of follow-up of patients with pancreatic non-functioning neuroendocrine tumors of the stage T1–T2 using a medical registry.

Materials and methods. A retrospective analysis of the medical registry data of the Loginov Moscow Scientific Center was conducted, which included 312 patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors from 2014 to 2023. Observation was recommended for 115 (36.9 %) patients. The inclusion criteria: diagnosis of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor; non-functioning tumor status; asymptomatic disease; tumor size less than 3 cm; patient’s consent. The exclusion criteria were patient’s refusal of observation; tumor growth of more than 3 mm/year of observation; appearance of disease symptoms. Based on the registry data, gender and age of patients, size and location of tumors, TNM stage, tumor growth dynamics (mm/year), biochemical markers of neuroendocrine tumors, and the presence of concomitant pathology were studied. Whole genome sequencing was performed on 53 patients with first diagnosed pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Results. Six patients (5.2 %) were excluded from the study: three refused to be observed, three demonstrated tumor growth. 109 patients diagnosed with non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor were included in the analysis: 78 (71.6 %) women and 31 (28.4 %) men aged from 22 to 86 years (58.5 ± 10.8 years) at the time of presentation. The median follow-up time was 34.0 (2.0–86.0) months. The most common location of tumors was in the head of the pancreas — 45.5 % (n = 51). Of the 109 patients observed, 103 were diagnosed with stage T1 tumors (94.5 %), 6 — with T2 (5.5 %). The average tumor size was 11.9 ± 3.8 mm (3.1–29.0 mm) (n = 118). An increase in biochemical markers of neuroendocrine tumors (gastrin, chromogranin A) was associated with atrophic gastritis. Germline mutations were detected in 24.0 % of patients (n = 12). The most common mutations in the sample were the CHEK2 gene (n = 4).

Conclusions. According to the registry data, active observation is an acceptable tactic for managing patients with T1 non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Likely it is not the size of the tumor but its growth rate that has prognostic significance, and therefore a protocol for monitoring this group of patients is required. The effect of estrogens on tumor growth inhibition and the role of CHEK2 gene mutations are perspectives for future research.

About the Authors

I. E. Khatkov
Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Center
Russian Federation

Igor E. Khatkov — Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor, Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Director, Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Center

111123, Moscow, Novogireevskaya, 1, build. 1



D. A. Salimgereeva
Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Center
Russian Federation

Diana A. Salimgereeva — Junior Researcher of the Center of Endocrine and Metabolic Surgery

111123, Moscow, Novogireevskaya, 1, build. 1



I. Yu. Feidorov
Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Center
Russian Federation

YIlia Yu. Feidorov — Cand. Sci. (Med.), Head of the Center of Endocrine and Metabolic Surgery

111123, Moscow, Novogireevskaya, 1, build. 1



A. A. Konyakhina
Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Center
Russian Federation

Anna A. Konyakhina — Laboratory Research Assistant at the Center of Endocrine and Metabolic Surgery

111123, Moscow, Novogireevskaya, 1, build. 1



A. L. Petrova
Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Center
Russian Federation

Aleksandra L. Petrova — Surgeon of the Clinical and Diagnostic Department 

111123, Moscow, Novogireevskaya, 1, build. 1



References

1. Kuo E.J., Salem R.R. Population-level analysis of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors 2 cm or less in size. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(9):2815–21. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-013-3005-7

2. Wilder R.M., Allan F.N., Power W.H., Robertson E.H. Carcinoma of the islands of the pancreas: Hiperinsulinism and hypoglycemia. JAMA. 1927;89(5):348–55. DOI:10.1001/jama.1927.02690050014007

3. Salimgereeva D.A., Feidorov I.Y., Khatkov I.E. Pancrea tic resections or observation in management of sporadic non-functioningstageT1neuroendocrinetumorsofthepancreas (PNET) (literature review). Endocrine Surgery. 2023;17(1):35–41. (InRuss.). DOI:10.14341/serg12775

4. Yin Y., Liang H., Wei N., Zheng Z. Prevalence of chronic atrophic gastritis worldwide from 2010 to 2020: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Palliat Med.2022;11(12):3697–703.DOI:10.21037/apm-21-1464

5. Qiu W., Christakis I., Stewart A.A., Vodopivec D.M., Silva-Figueroa A., Chen H., et al. Is estrogen exposure a protective factor for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours in female patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type1? Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2017;86(6):791–7. DOI:10.1111/cen.13324

6. Sundin A., Arnold R., Baudin E., Cwikla J.B., Eriksson B., Fanti S., et al. ENETS consensus guidelines for the standards of care in neuroendocrine tumors: Radiological, nuclear medicine & hybrid imaging. Neuroendocrinology.

7. Baranova O.D., Roumiantsev P.O., Slashchuk K.Y., Petrov L.O. Radionuclide imaging and therapy in patients with neuroendocrine tumors. Endocrine Surgery. 2017;11(4):178–90. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.14341/serg957

8. Egorov A.V., Kondrashin S.A., Vasiliev I.A., Ivashov I.V., Levkin V.V., Parnova V.A. Diagnostic features of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in multiple lesions. REJR. 2018;8(4):293–300. (In Russ.). DOI:10.21569/2222-7415-2018-8-4-293-300

9. Davey A., van Herk M., Faivre-Finn C., Brown S., McWilliam A. Automated gross tumor volume contour generation for large-scale analysis of early-stage lung cancer patients planned with 4D-CT. Med Phys. 2021;48(2):724–32. DOI:10.1002/mp.14644

10. Çalapkulu M., Sencar M.E., Unsal I.O., Sakiz D., Duger H., Özbek M., et al. Tumorvolume can be used as a parameter indicating the severity of disease in parathyroid cancer. Endocr Pract. 2021;27(7):706–9. DOI:10.1016/j.eprac.2021.01.006

11. Reddy R.P., Ross Schmidtlein C., Giancipoli R.G., Mauguen A., LaFontaine D., Schoder H., et al. The quest for an accurate functional tumor volume with 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT. J Nucl Med. 2022;63(7):1027–32. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.121.262782

12. Zhukov О.B., Scheplev P.A., Ignatiev A.V. Artificial intelligence in medicine: From hybrid studies and clinical validation to development of application models. Andrology and Genital Surgery. 2019;20(3):15–19. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17650/2070-9781-2019-20-2-15-19

13. Shi Y.J., Zhu H.T., Liu Y.L., Wei Y.Y., Qin X.B., Zhang X.Y., et al. Radiomics analysis based on diffusion kurtosis imaging and T2 weighted imaging for differentiation of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors from solid pseudopapillary tumors. Front Oncol. 2020;10:1624. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01624

14. Paramzin F.N., Kakotkin V.V., Burkin D.A., Agapov M.A. Radiomics and artificial intelligence in the differential diagnosis of tumor and non-tumor diseases of the pancreas. Review. Surgical Practice (Russia). 2023;1:53–65. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.38181/2223-2427-2023-1-5

15. Gruzdev I.S., Karmazanovsky G.G., Lapteva M.G., Zamyatina K.A., Tikhonova V.S., Kondratyev E.V., et al.Textureand CT-features in differentiation of hypervascular pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors from renal cell carcinoma metastases: Diagnostic model. Medical Visualization. 2022;26(4):102–9. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24835/1607-0763-1247

16. Javed A.A., Zhu Z., Kinny-Köster B., Habib J.R., Kawamoto S., Hruban R.H., et al. Accurate non-invasive grading of nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors with a CT derived radiomics signature. Diagn Interv Ima-ging. 2024;105(1):33–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.diii.2023.08.002

17. Zhu H.B., Zhu H.T., Jiang L., Nie P., Hu J., Tang W., et al. Radiomics analysis from magnetic resonance imaging in predicting the grade of nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: A multicenter study. Eur Radiol. 2024;34(1):90–102. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-09957-7

18. Scarpa A., Chang D.K., Nones K., Corbo V., Patch A.M., Bailey P., et al. Whole-genome landscape of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. Nature. 2017;543(7643):65–71. DOI: 10.1038/nature21063

19. Bychkovsky B.L., Agaoglu N.B., Horton C., Zhou J., Yussuf A., Hemyari P., et al. Differences in cancer phenotypes among frequent CHEK2 variants and implications for clinical care-checking CHEK2. JAMA Oncol. 2022;8(11):1598–606. DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.4071

20. Vallera R.D., Ding Y., Hatanpaa K.J., Bishop J.A., Mirfakhraee S., Alli A.A., et al. Case report:Two sisters with a germline CHEK2 variant and distinct endocrine neoplasias. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022;13:1024108. DOI:10.3389/fendo.2022.1024108

21. Andersen K.Ø., Detlefsen S., Brusgaard K., Christesen H.T. Well-differentiated G1 and G2 pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: A meta-analysis of published expanded DNA sequencing data. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024;15:1351624. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1351624

22. Partelli S., Massironi S., Zerbi A., Niccoli P., Kwon W., Landoni L., et al. Management of asymptomatic sporadic non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms no larger than 2 cm: Interim analysis of prospective ASPEN trial. Br J Surgery. 2022;109(12):1186–90. DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znac267


Review

For citations:


Khatkov I.E., Salimgereeva D.A., Feidorov I.Yu., Konyakhina A.A., Petrova A.L. Outcomes Following Observation of Small Non-Functioning Neuroendocrine Tumors of the Pancreas. Data from the Registry of the Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Center. Russian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Coloproctology. 2025;35(2):83-94. https://doi.org/10.22416/1382-4376-2025-35-2-83-94

Views: 259


ISSN 1382-4376 (Print)
ISSN 2658-6673 (Online)