Modern options and prospects of treatment of resistant forms of gastroesophageal reflux disease
Abstract
The aim of review. To discuss the factors promoting resistance of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) to treatment and possible ways to overcome this phenomenon.
Original positions. It was demonstrated, that the causes of resistant forms of GERD are diverse and connected related both to subjective factors (poor patient compliance) and to objective factors («night acid breakthrough», episodes of non-acid reflux, etc.). Potentials of treatment of resistant forms of GERD include increase of proton pump inhibitors (PPI) dose, application of parenteral forms of PPI if necessary and combination to Н2-blockers. Further prospects of improvement of acidsuppressive agents action are related to development of new generations of PPIs.
Conclusion. Resistant forms of GERD are quite frequent in clinical practice. Now there are various options to increase treatment efficacy.
About the Author
A. A. Sheptulin
ГОУ ВПО «Первый Московский государственный медицинский университет им. И.М. Сеченова Росздрава»
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Baldi F. PPI non responsive heartburn // 15. United European Gastroenterology Week. Syllabus of the Postgraduate Teaching Programme. – Paris, 2007. – P. 143–148.
2. Bardon M., Martin J., Barkun A. Intravenous proton pump inhibitors: an evidence-based review of their use in gastrointestinal disorders // Drug. – 2009. – Vol. 69. – P. 436–448.
3. Barrison A.F., Jarbe L.A., Weinberg M.D. et al. Patterns of proton pump inhibitors in clinical practice // Am. J. Med. – 2001. – Vol. 111. – P. 469–473.
4. Becker V., Bajbouj M., Waller C. et al. Intraluminalimpedance guided therapy for PPI-resistant gastroesophageal reflux – A follow-up study // Gut. – 2007. – Vol. 56 (suppl. 3). – P. 208.
5. Beglinger C., Degen L., Schroller S. et al. Oral itriglumid, a speciphic CCK2/gastrin receptor antagonist, inhibits gastrin stimulated gastric acid secretion in humans // Gut. – 2005. – Vol. 54 (suppl. 7). – P. 36.
6. Bell N.J.V., Burget D., Howden C.W. et al. Appropriate acid suppression for the management of gastro-esophageal reflux disease // Digestion. – 1992. – Vol. 51 (suppl. 1). – P. 59–67.
7. Boeckstaens G.E., Denison H., Ruth M. Effect of AZD3355, a novel GABA(B) agonist, on reflux and lower esophageal sphincter function in patients with GERD with symptoms despite proton pump inhibitor treatment // Gut. – 2009. – Vol. 58 (supP. 2). – P. 6.
8. Burget D.W., Chiverton K.D., Hunt R.H. Is there an optimal degree of acid suppression for healing of duodenal ulcers? A model of the relationship between ulcer healing and acid suppression // Gastroenterology. – 1990. – Vol. 99. – P. 345–351.
9. Casini V., Pace F., Pallotta S. et al. Usefulness of pH-impedance monitoring (pH-Mii) in a tertiary referral centre // Gut. – 2007. – Vol. 56 (suppl. 3). – P. 208.
10. Castell D. Review on immediate-release omeprazole for the treatment of gastric acid-relate disorders // Expert Opin. Pharmacother. – 2005. – Vol. 6. – P. 2501– 2510.
11. Chey W.D., Inadomi J.M., Booher A.M. et al. Primary-care physician’s perceptions and practices on the management of GERD: results of a national survey // Am. J. Gastroenterol. – 2005. – Vol. 100. – P. 1237– 1242.
12. Furuta T., Shirai N., Watanabe F. et al. Effect of cytochrome P4502C19 genotypic differences on cure rates for gastroesophageal reflux disease by lansoprasole // Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. – 2002. – Vol. 72. – P. 453– 460.
13. Hartmann D., Eickhoff A., Damian U. et al. Effect of intravenous application of esomeprazole 40 mg versus pantoprazole 40 mg on 24-hour intragastric pH in healthy adults // Eur. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. – 2007. – Vol. 19. – P. 133–137.
14. Howden C.W. Review article: immediate-release proton-pump inhibitor therapy – potential advantages // Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. – 2005. – Vol. 22. (suppl. 3). – P. 25–30.
15. Hunt R.H., Yuan Y., Yaghhoobi M. GERD: new strategies and new failures // J. Clin. Gastroenterol. – 2007. – Vol. 41 (suppl. 2). – P. 72–77.
16. Inamori M., Togawa J., Iwasaki T. et al. Early effects of lafutidine or rabeprazole on intragastric acticity : which drug is more suitable for on demand use // J. Gastroenterol. – 2005. – Vol. 40. – P. 453–458.
17. Isomoto H., Inoue M., Furusu H. et al. Lafutidine, a novel histamine H2-receptor antagonist vs lansoprazole in combinаtion with amoxicillin and clarithromycin for eradication of Helicobacter pylori // Helicobacter. – 2003. – Vol. 8. – P. 111–119.
18. Jonson C., Sjoberg F., Fandrix L. et al. A novel formulation contaning omeprazole and famotidine (OX17), provides a prompt and long-lasting control on GERD patients // Gut. – 2008. – Vol. 57 (suppl. 2). – P. 321.
19. Lenglinger J., Eisler M. Ringhofer C. et al. Diagnostic yield of oesophageal impedance-and pH-monitoring in patients with typical symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease of therapy // Gut. – 2007. – Vol. 56. (suppl. 3). – P. 210.
20. Macovec F., Revel L., Letari O. Characterization of antisecretory and antiulcer activity of CR-2945, a new potent and selective gastrin/CCK(B) receptor antagonist // Eur. J. Pharmacol. – 1999. – Vol. 369. – P. 81– 90.
21. Mainie I., Tutuian R., Shay S. et al. Acid and non-acid reflux in patients with persistent symptoms despite acid suppressive therapy: a multicentre study using combined ambulatory impedance-pH monitoring // Gut. – 2006. – Vol. 55. – P. 1398–1402.
22. Malfertheiner P., Mönkemüller K., Wex T. GERD: endoscopic assesment: a reconcillation with symptoms // J. Clin. Gastroenterol. – 2007. – Vol. 41 (suppl. 2). – P. 193–197.
23. Moayyedi P. Who pays the piper? // J. Clin. Gastroenterol. – 2007. – Vol. 41 (suppl. 2). – P. 97– 101.
24. Nissen W.S., Olsen K.M. Selection of proton pump inhibitors for formulari inclusion // Dis. Manage. Health Outcome. – 2007. – Vol. 15. – P. 289–298.
25. Orr W.C., Harnish M.J. The efficacy of omeprazole twice daily with supplemental H2 blockade ad bedtime in the suppression of nocturnal oesophageal and gastric acidity // Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. – 2003. – Vol. 17. – P. 1553–1558.
26. Pace F., Riegler G., de Leone A. «True» non erosive reflux disease (NERD) is characterized by a lower response to proton pump inhibitors (PPIS) compared to erosive reflux disease (ERD) // Gut. – 2009. – Vol. 58 (suppl. 2). – P. 282.
27. Peres de la Serna J., Ruiz de Leon A., Sevilla-Mantilla C. et al. Acid breakthrough in GERD patients under proton pump inhibitors (PPI) treatment in a daily practice // Gut. – 2007. – Vol. 56. (suppl. 3). – P. 217.
28. Periclou A.P., Goldwater R., Lee S.M. et al. A comparative pharmacodynamic study of IY-81149 versus omeprazole in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease // Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. – 2000. – Vol. 68. – P. 304–311.
29. Pezanoski J., Guanaratnam N., Cowen M. Correct and incorrect dosing of proton pump inhibitors and its impact on GERD symptoms // Gastroenterology. – 2003. – Vol. 124 (suppl.). – P. 128.
30. Rackoff A., Agrawal A., Hila A. et al. Histamine-2 receptor antagonists at night improve gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms for patients on proton pump inhibitor therapy // Dis. Esophagus. – 2005. – Vol. 18. – P. 370–373.
31. Tack J. Medical treatment: optimizing the old and introducing the new // 17. United European Gastroenterology Week. Syllabus of the Postgraduate Teaching Programme. – London, 2009. – P. 175–178.
32. Tonini M., de Giorgio R., de Ponti F. Novel therapeutic strategies in acid-related disorders // Expert Opin. Ther. Patents. – 2003. – Vol. 13. – P. 639–649.
33. Tutuian R., Katz P.O., Castell D.O. Nocturnal acid breakththrough, drugs and bugs // Eur. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. – 2004. – Vol. 16. – P. 441–463.
34. Tytgat G.N. Shortcomings of the first-generation proton pump inhibitors // Eur. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol.
35. – 2001. – Vol. 13. (suppl.). – P. 29–33.
36. Tytgat G.N.J. Gastroesophageal reflux disease: reflection ANO 2006 // J. Clin. Gastroenterol. – 2007. – Vol. 41 (suppl. 2). – P. 222–225.
37. Wilder-Smith C.H., Rőhss K., Bondarov P. et al. Esomeprazole 40 mg provides faster and more effective intragastric acid control than pantoprazole 40 mg i.v.: results of a randomized study // Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. – 2004. – Vol. 20. – P. 1099–1104.
38. Zerbib F., Roman S., Ropert A. et al. Oesophageal pH-impedance monitoring and symptom analysis in GERD: a study in patients off and on therapy // Am. J. Gastroenterol. – 2006. – Vol. 101. – P. 1956–1963.
Review
For citations:
Sheptulin A.A. Modern options and prospects of treatment of resistant forms of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Russian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Coloproctology. 2010;20(6):81-85. (In Russ.)
Views:
68
Email this article 
