Preview

Russian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Coloproctology

Advanced search

Diagnostic options of non-invasive assessment of fibrosis at diffuse liver diseases

Abstract

Aim of investigation. To study potentials of noninvasive methods application for assessment of liver fibrosis at screening diagnosis of patients with diffuse liver diseases.

Material and methods. Overall 188 HCV RNApositive patients and 61 HBV DNA-positive were investigated. The stage of disease in all patients was verified by morphological study with assessment of histological activity index (HAI) and stage of fibrosis (F). These data were compared to data of non-invasive evaluation of liver fibrosis – i.e. results of biochemical tests (de Ritis coefficients, APRI), ultrasound investigation with Doppler ultrasonography, videodensitometry, elastometry (EM) by FibroScan device («EchoSens», France).

Results. Significant differences in scores of liver tissue elasticity in relation to stage of fibrosis (F0, F1, F2, F3, F4) – р<0,001 were revealed at HCV-infection and р><0,05 at HBV-infection. EM sensitivity and specificity ranged from 0,8 to 0,99 (area under the ROC-curve). Canonical discriminant analysis with drawing of territorial map, that allow to define fibrosis stage as mild, moderate or severe, using data of ultrasound investigation, was carried out. Conclusions. Application of non-invasive methods of evaluation of fibrosis is reasonable at primary investigation of HCV RNA-and HBV DNA-positive patients. Today high diagnostic accuracy allows to consider elastometry as a method of choice in diagnostics of liver fibrosis in diffuse liver diseases. ><0,001 were revealed at HCV-infection and р< 0,05 at HBV-infection. EM sensitivity and specificity ranged from 0,8 to 0,99 (area under the ROC-curve). Canonical discriminant analysis with drawing of territorial map, that allow to define fibrosis stage as mild, moderate or severe, using data of ultrasound investigation, was carried out.

Conclusions. Application of non-invasive methods of evaluation of fibrosis is reasonable at primary investigation of HCV RNA-and HBV DNA-positive patients. Today high diagnostic accuracy allows to consider elastometry as a method of choice in diagnostics of liver fibrosis in diffuse liver diseases.

About the Authors

I. Yu. Pirogova
Городской центр хирургии печени и поджелудочной железы, городская клиническая больница № 8
Russian Federation


S. A. Pyshkin
Городской центр хирургии печени и поджелудочной железы, городская клиническая больница № 8
Russian Federation


Ye. V. Yefremova
Городской центр хирургии печени и поджелудочной железы, городская клиническая больница № 8
Russian Federation


A. N. Gorfinkel
Городской центр хирургии печени и поджелудочной железы, городская клиническая больница № 8
Russian Federation


S. G. Pogorelova
Городской центр хирургии печени и поджелудочной железы, городская клиническая больница № 8
Russian Federation


N. V. Abramovskaya
Городской центр хирургии печени и поджелудочной железы, городская клиническая больница № 8
Russian Federation


References

1. Исаков В.А. Как определять выраженность фиброза печени и зачем? // Клин. гастроэнтерол. гепатол. Русское издание. – 2008. – Т. 1, № 2. – C. 72–75.

2. Павлов Ч.С., Шульпекова Ю.О., Золотаревский Б.В., Ивашкин В.Т. Современные представления о патогенезе, диагностике и лечении фиброза печени// Рос. журн. гастроэнтерол. гепатол. колопроктол. – 2005. – Т. 15, № 2. – С. 13–20.

3. Bedossa P., Dardgere D., Paradis V. Sampling variability of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C // Hepatology. – 2003. – Vol. 38. – P. 1449–1457.

4. Bravo A.A., Sneth S.G., Shopra S. Liver biopsy // N. Engl. J. Med. – 2001. – Vol. 344. – P. 495–500.

5. Cholongitas E., Senzolo M., Standish R. et al. A systematic review of the quality of liver biopsy speciments // Am. J. Pathol. – 2006. – Vol. 125. – P. 710–721.

6. Fontana R.J., Loc A.S. Noninvasive monitoring of patients with chronic hepatitis C // Hepatology. – 2002. – Vol. 36. – P. 57–64.

7. Foucher J., Chanteloup E., Vergniol J. et al. Diagnosis of cirrhosis by transient elastography (FibroScan): a prospective study // Gut. – 2006. – Vol. 55, N 3. – Р. 403–408.

8. Lim A.K., Patel N., Escersley L.J. et al. Can Doppler sonography grade the severity of hepatitis C – related liver disease? // AJR. Am. J. Roentgenol. – 2005. – Vol. 184. – P. 1848–1853.

9. Liu C.-H., Hsu S.-J., Lin J.-W. et al. Неинвазивная диагностика фиброза печени при хроническом гепатите C с помощью допплерографии по индексу пульсации селезеночной артерии // Клин. гастроэнтерол. гепатол. Русское издание. – 2008. – Т. 1, № 2. – C. 101–109.

10. Regev A., Berho M., Jeffers L.G. et al. Sampling error and intraobserver variation in liver biopsy in patients with chronic HCV infection // Am. J. Gastroenterol. – 2002. – Vol. 97, N 10. – Р. 2614–2618.

11. Rosenberg V.M., Voelker M., Thiel R. et al. European Liver Fibrosis Group. Serum makes detect the presence of liver fibrosis; a cohort sturdy // Gastroenterology. – 2004. – Vol. 127. – P. 1704–1713.

12. Sneth S.G., Flamm S.L., Gordon F.D. et al. ACT/ALT ratio predicts cirrhosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection // Am. J. Gastroenterol. – 1998. – Vol. 93. – P. 44–48.

13. Stauber R.E., Lackner C. Noninvasive diagnosis of hepatic fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C // World J. Gastroenterol. – 2007. – Vol. 13, N 32. – P. 4287–4294.

14. Talwalkar J.A., Kurtz D.M., Shoenleber S.J. et al. Непрямая эластография с помощью ультразвука в диагностике фиброза: систематический обзор и мета-анализ // Клин. гастроэнтерол. гепатол. Русское издание. – 2008. – Т. 1, № 2. – C. 76–83.

15. Yin M., Talvalcar J.A., Glaser K.J. et al. Оценка выраженности фиброза печени с помощью магнитно-резонансной томографии // Клин. гастроэнтерол. гепатол. Русское издание. – 2008. – Т. 1, № 2. – C. 92–100.


Review

For citations:


Pirogova I.Yu., Pyshkin S.A., Yefremova Ye.V., Gorfinkel A.N., Pogorelova S.G., Abramovskaya N.V. Diagnostic options of non-invasive assessment of fibrosis at diffuse liver diseases. Russian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Coloproctology. 2009;19(4):48-54. (In Russ.)

Views: 11


ISSN 1382-4376 (Print)
ISSN 2658-6673 (Online)