Anal Incontinence after Anterior Rectum Resection in Cancer Patients
https://doi.org/10.22416/1382-4376-2020-30-1-34-37
Abstract
Aim. To study the functioning of the anal sphincter after performing anterior rectum resection in cancer patients.
Materials and methods. The anal sphincter function was studied in 144 patients with colorectal cancer, equally in 72 men and 72 women. The study was carried out at the Rostov Cancer Research Institute. All patients underwent R0 anterior rectum resection with the total mesorectumectomy and the formation of a preventive ileostomy. An assessment of the retention function was performed by sphincterometry using a manometric complex with a nonperfusion water-filling sensor according to the generally accepted method.
Results. Disturbances in the normal functioning of the sphincter were noted in 24 (16.7 %) patients. The use of sphincterometry allowed disturbances in the functioning of the internal and external anal sphincters in men and women to be identified, along with differences between the groups. The results indicate a higher incidence of anal incontinence (AI) in women compared to men (t ≥ 2, the differences are significant). In addition, patients with a lower localisation of the anastomosis demonstrated a higher incidence of AI and more pronounced AI manifestations.
Conclusions. The obtained data on the functioning of the anal sphincter after anterior rectum resection in cancer patients indicate gender differences in the incidence of late complications after surgery, as well as the importance of taking into account the localisation of the tumour for selecting an adequate amount of surgical intervention.
About the Authors
O. I. KitRussian Federation
Dr. Sci. (Med.), Prof., RAS Corresponding Member, CEO
344037, Rostov-on-Don, 14 line, 63
E. N. Kolesnikov
Russian Federation
Cand. Sci. (Med.), Departmental Head, Department of Abdominal Oncology No. 1, REMDL group
344037, Rostov-on-Don, 14 line, 63
M. A. Averkin
Russian Federation
Cand. Sci. (Med.), oncologist, Department of Abdominal Oncology No. 1, REMDL group
344037, Rostov-on-Don, 14 line, 63
S. V. Sanamyants
Russian Federation
Cand. Sci. (Med.), oncologist, Department of Abdominal Oncology No. 1, REMDL group
344037, Rostov-on-Don, 14 line, 63
A. V. Snezhko
Russian Federation
Dr. Sci. (Med.), surgeon, Department of Abdominal Oncology No. 1, REMDL group
344037, Rostov-on-Don, 14 line, 63
References
1. Arkhipova O.E., Chernogubova E.A., Likhtanskaya N.V., Tarasov V.A., Kit O.I., Matishov D.G. Analysis of the cancer incidence in the Rostov Oblast (spatio-temporal statistics). Fundamental'nye issledovaniya. 2013; 7–3: 504–10 (In Russ.)
2. Kaprin A.D., Starinskiy V.V. Malignant neoplasms in Russia 2018 (morbidity and mortality). Moscow, 2019:250 (In Russ.).
3. Kit O.I., Gevorkyan Yu.A., Soldatkina N.V. Ways to improve the results of the mechanical anastomosis in surgery of colorectal cancer. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2013; 12:37–42 (In Russ.).
4. Fomenko O.Yu. Mechanisms of impaired evacuation and retention function in rectum diseases and the direction of pathogenetically substantiated diagnosis and therapy: Doctoral thesis. Moscow, 2017:257 (In Russ.).
5. Shelygin Yu.A., Fomenko O.Yu., Titov A.Yu., Berseneva E.A., Mudrov A.A., Belousova S.V. Sphincterometric grading of anal sphincter incompetence at the A. N. Ryzhykh National Research Centre for Coloproctology. Coloproctology. 2016;4:54–9 (In Russ.).
6. Glasgo S.C., Lowry A.C. Long-term outcomes of anal sphincter repair for fecal incontinence: a systematic review. Dis colon rectum. 2012;55(4):482–90. DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e3182468c22
7. Pehl C., Seidl H., Scalercio N., Gundling F., Schmidt T., Schepp W., Labermeyer S. Accuracy of anorectal manometry in patients with fecal incontinence. Digestion. 2012;86(2):78–85. DOI: 10.1159/000338954
8. Shelygin Yu.A., Fomenko O.Yu., Titov A.Yu., Veselov V.V., Belousova S.V., Aleshin D.V. Normal sphincterometric indicators of pressure in the anal canal at the A. N. Ryzhykh National Research Centre for Coloproctology. Coloproctology. 2016;2:32–6 (In Russ.).
9. Noelting J., Ratuapli S.K., Bharucha A.E., Harvey D.M., Ravi K., Zinsmeister A.R. Normal values for high-resolution anorectal manometry in healthy women: effects of age and significance of rectoanal gradient. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2012;107(10):1530–6. DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2012.221
10. Rao S.S., Azpiroz F., Diamant N., Enck P., Tougas G., Wald A. Minimum standards of anorectal manometry. Neurogastrointerol. Motil. 2002;14(5):553–9.
11.
Review
For citations:
Kit O.I., Kolesnikov E.N., Averkin M.A., Sanamyants S.V., Snezhko A.V. Anal Incontinence after Anterior Rectum Resection in Cancer Patients. Russian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Coloproctology. 2020;30(1):34-37. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22416/1382-4376-2020-30-1-34-37