Preview

Russian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Coloproctology

Advanced search

Stool immunoassay for identification of colorectal cancer and other significant gastrointestinal diseases risk groups

https://doi.org/10.22416/1382-4376-2016-26-2-50-57

Abstract

Aim of investigation. To carry out comparative analysis of diagnostic sensitivity of three immunochemical stool tests as a first step of laboratory algorithm to define high risk groups for colorectal cancer (CRC) and other clinically severe diseases of gastrointestinal tract (GIT). Material and methods. Content of hHb, hHb/ Hp and fTu M2-PK was investigated by solid-phase immunoenzyme tests in stool samples of 447 patients: 157 primary CRC cases, 121 stomach cancer (SC) patients, 64 ulcerative colitis (UC), 20 colonic polyps (CP) patients and 85 healthy donors. Following cut off levels were used: hHb - 2,0 µg/mL, hHb/Hp - 0,5 µg/ mL and fTu M2-PK - 4,0 U/mL. Results. The test systems for hHb and hHb/Hp in stool had high sensitivity, that was similar for CRC (89.5% of and of 87.9%, respectively) and UC (79.0% of and of 71.9%). The rate of exceeding upper thresholds for hHb and hHb/Hp in SC patients was 51.2 and 43.8%, respectively, and only 20% for CP patients. hHb and hHb/Hp markers had high specificity for healthy donors (95.3% of and of 97.6%, respectively). Close correlation between hHb and hHb/Hp indicates that these tests are interchangeable for CRC diagnostics. fTu M2-PK sensitivity was 79.2% for CRC, 68.3% - for UC, 51.2% - for SC and fTu M2-PK-specificity was 94.7% as compared to donors. If elevation of at least one marker in a pair (hHb and fTu M2-PK) will be considered as positivity of the test overall, the sensitivity of laboratory testing rises for CRC to 95.0%, for UC - to 83.6% and for SC - to 69.0% at specificity of 91.3%. Conclusions. Comparative analysis of three stool tests (hHb, hHb/Hp and fTu M2-PK) has shown that the optimal combination for detection of CRC risk groups includes detection of fecal hHb and fTu M2-PK. Increase of at least one marker in this pair may be due to the presence of severe gastrointestinal disease, including CRC, that allows to select patient for subsequent investigation of the digestive system. Key words: colorectal cancer, stomach cancer, ulcerative colitis, colonic polyps, fecal immunochemical test (FIT), hHb, hHb/Hp, fTu M2-PK.

About the Authors

N. S. Sergeeva
State educational government-financed institution of higher professional education «Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University»
Russian Federation


Nina V. Marshutina
Gertsen Moscow oncological research institute
Russian Federation


Ye. V. Zenkina
Gertsen Moscow oncological research institute
Russian Federation


References

1. Петрова Г.В., Каприн А.Д., Старинский В.В., Грецова О.П. Заболеваемость злокачественныминовообразованиями населения России. Онкология. Журн. им. П.А. Герцена 2014; 5:5-11.

2. Пиманов С.И., Михайлова Е.И., Бондаренко В.М. Иммунохимический тест на скрытую кровь в кале вскрининговой диагностике КРР. Новости хирургии 2006;14(3):66-73.

3. Сергеева Н.С., Чиссов В.И., Воробьёв Г.И. и др. Исследование диагностической чувствительности новых опухолеассоциированных копрологических маркеров при колоректальном раке. Рос онкол журн 2010; 2:21-4.

4. Состояние онкологической помощи населению России в2014 году //Под ред. Каприна А.Д., Старинского В.В., Петровой Г.В. М.: ФГБУ «МНИОИ им. П.А. Герцена» 2015. 235 с.

5. Allison J.E., Fraser C.G., Halloran S.P., Young G.P. Comparison fecal immunochemical tests: improved standardization is needed. Gastroenterology 2012; 142 (3):422-4.

6. Eigenbrodt E., Mazurek S., Friis R.R. Double role of pyruvate kinase type M2 in the regulation of phosphometabolite pools. Cell Growth and Oncogenesis 1998; 2:15-30.

7. Ewald N., Shaller M., Bayer M. et al. Fecal pyruvate kinase-M2 (tumor M2-PK) measurement: a new screening concept for colorectal cancer. Anticancer Res 2007; 27(4A):1949-52.

8. Fraser C.G., Allison J.E., Halloran S.P., Young G.P. A proposal to standardize reporting units for fecal immunochemical tests for hemoglobin. J Nat Cancer Inst 2012; 104(11):810-4.

9. Haug U., Rothenbacher D., Wente M.N. et al. Tumour M2-PK as a stool marker for colorectal cancer: comparative analysis in a large sample of unselected older adults vs colorectal cancer patients. Br J Cancer 2007; 7 (96):1329- 34.

10. Hewitson P., Glasziou P., Watson E., Towler B., Irwig L. Cochrane systematic review of colorectal cancer screening using the fecal occult blood test (hemoccult): an update. Am J Gastroenterol 2008; 103(6):1541-49.

11. Hoepffner N., Shastri Y., Hanisch E. et al. Comparative evaluation of a new bedside faecal occult blood test in a prospective multicentre study 1. Aliment Pharm Ther 2006; 23:145-54.

12. Karl J., Wild N., Tacke M. et al. Improved diagnosis of colorectal cancer using a combination of fecal occult blood and novel fecal protein markrs. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008; 6(10):1122-8.

13. Lange V. Haptoglobin polymorphism - Not only a genetic marker. Anthropology 1992; 50:281-302.

14. Lustbader J.M., Arcole J.P., Birkin S. et al. Hemoglobin- binding site on haptoglobin probed by selective proteolysis. J Biol Chem 1983; 258(2):1227-34.

15. Mazurek S., Grimm H., Oehmke M. et al. Tumor M2-PK and glutaminolytic enzymes in the metabolic shift of tumor cells. Anticancer Res 2000; 20:5151-4.

16. Sieg A., Thoms C., Lüthgens K., John M.R., Schmidt- Gayk H. Detection of colorectal neoplasms by the highly sensitive hemoglobin-haptoglobin complex in feces. Int J Colorectal Dis 1999; 14 (6):267-71.

17. Tonus C., Sellinger M., Koss K., NeupertG. Faecal pyruvate kinase isoenzyme type M2 for colorectal cancer screening: A meta-analysis. Wld J Gastroenterol 2012; 18(30):4004-11.


Review

For citations:


Sergeeva N.S., Marshutina N.V., Zenkina Ye.V. Stool immunoassay for identification of colorectal cancer and other significant gastrointestinal diseases risk groups. Russian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Coloproctology. 2016;26(2):50-57. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22416/1382-4376-2016-26-2-50-57

Views: 934


ISSN 1382-4376 (Print)
ISSN 2658-6673 (Online)