Antegrade Endobiliary Forceps Biopsy Improves Diagnosis of Klatskin Tumor Compared to Brush Biopsy
https://doi.org/10.22416/1382-4376-2022-32-2-45-54
Abstract
Aim. To evaluate the safety and accuracy of percutaneous transhepatic biliary biopsy in patients with suspected Klatskin tumor.
Materials and methods. Between 2013–2020, percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) was performed in 52 patients with Klatskin tumor, complicated by obstructive jaundice. After successful PTBD, the diagnosis was verified by antegrade access. 74 procedures were performed: brush (n = 36; 48.6 %) or forceps biopsies (n = 38; 51.4 %).
Results. There were no adverse events associated with a brush biopsy. Only grade I complications were after the forceps technique: 3 patients (7.9 %) developed hemobilia, which was corrected conservatively. Malignant lesions of the biliary tract were detected by forceps technique in 79.0 %, brush biopsy in 66.7 % (p >0,05). The degree of tumor differentiation was determined in 60.0 % (n = 18) vs 12.5 % (n = 3) (p < 0,01), respectively.
Sensitivity and specificity of forceps biopsy were slightly higher than in brush: 82.4 % and 75.0 % vs 73.3 % and 66.7 % (p >0,05).
Conclusions. Antegrade percutaneous transhepatic biliary biopsy is safe for both brush and forceps techniques. However, forceps biopsy has higher sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis Klatskin tumor and better possibility of determining the degree of malignancy differentiation.
About the Authors
A. V. KozlovRussian Federation
Alexey V. Kozlov — Dr. Sci. (Med.), Doctor of the Department of Angiography
197758, St. Petersburg, Pesochny village, Leningradskaya str., 70
P. G. Tarazov
Pavel G. Tarazov — Dr. Sci. (Med.), Prof., Head of the Department of Angiography, chief researcher of the Department of Interventional Radiology and Operative Surgery
197758, St. Petersburg, Pesochny village, Leningradskaya str., 70
A. A. Polikarpov
Alexey A. Polikarpov — Dr. Sci. (Med.), Prof. of the Department of Radiology, Surgery and Oncology, Doctor of the Department of Angiography
197758, St. Petersburg, Pesochny village, Leningradskaya str., 70
A. V. Moiseenko
Andrey V. Moiseenko — doctor
197758, St. Petersburg, Pesochny village, Leningradskaya str., 70
A. I. Urbansky
Alexander I. Urbansky — Cand. Sci. (Med.), head of the Pathology department
197758, St. Petersburg, Pesochny village, Leningradskaya str., 70
M. V. Yutkin
Maksim V. Yutkin — doctor
197758, St. Petersburg, Pesochny village, Leningradskaya str., 70
G. M. Yakshieva
Yakshieva Gezel Maratovna — clinical resident of the Department of Radiology and Surgical Technologies
197022, St. Petersburg, Lva Tolstogo str., 6–8
D. A. Granov
Dmitry A. Granov — Dr. Sci. (Med.), Prof., Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Scientific Director; Head of the Department of Radiology and Surgical Technologies
197758, St. Petersburg, Pesochny village, Leningradskaya str., 70
197022, St. Petersburg, Lva Tolstogo str., 6–8
References
1. The state of oncological care for the population of Russia in 2020. Ed. Caprin A.D., Starinsky V.V., Shahzadova A.O. Moscow: MNIOI named after P.A. Herzen branch of FGBU “NIIRTs” of the Ministry of Health of Russia, 2020. (In Russ.).
2. Dondossola D., Ghidini M., Grossi F., Rossi G., Foschi D. Practical review for diagnosis and clinical management of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2020;26(25):3542–61. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i25.3542
3. Alieva S.B., Bazin I.S., Breder V.V., Borisov V.I., Virshke Je.R., Dolgushin B.I., et al. Clinical guidelines: Cancer of the biliary system. Moscow; 2020. 51 p. (In Russ.).
4. Blechacz B. Cholangiocarcinoma: Current knowledge and new developments. Gut Liver. 2017;11(1):13–26. DOI: 10.5009/gnl15568
5. Zhang X., Liu H. Klatskin tumor: A populationbased study of incidence and survival. Med Sci Monit. 2019;25:4503–12. DOI: 10.12659/MSM.914987
6. van Vugt J.L.A., Gaspersz M.P., Coelen R.J.S., Vugts J., Labeur T.A., de Jonge J., et al. The prognostic value of portal vein and hepatic artery involvement in patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. HPB (Oxford). 2018;20:83–92. DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2017.08.025
7. Sharma P., Yadav S. Demographics, tumor characteristics, treatment, and survival of patients with Klatskin tumors. Ann Gastroenterol. 2018;31(2):231–6. DOI: 10.20524/aog.2018.0233
8. Rizvi S., Eaton J., Yang J.D., Chandrasekhara V., Gores G.J. Emerging technologies for the diagnosis of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Semin Liver Dis. 2018;38:160–9. DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1655775
9. Khan A.S., Dageforde L.A. Cholangiocarcinoma. Surg Clin North Am. 2019;99(2):315–35. DOI: 10.1016/j.suc.2018.12.004
10. Bisello S., Buwenge M., Palloni A., Autorino R., Cellini F., Macchia G., et al. Radiotherapy or chemoradiation in unresectable biliary cancer: a retrospective study. Anticancer Res. 2019;39(6):3095–100. DOI: 10.21873/ anticanres.13445
11. Kashenko V.A., Solonitsyn E.G., Titov A.K., Vorobev S.L., Tamazyan N.V., Stepanov D.A. Endoscopic techniques of obtaining material for morphological examination for bile ducts strictures. Experimental and Clinical Gastroenterology. 2017;140(4):34–40 (In Russ.).
12. Boos J., Yoo R., Steinkeler J., Ayata G., Ahmed M., Sarwar A., et al. Fluoroscopic percutaneous brush cytology, forceps biopsy and both in tandem for diagnosis of malignant biliary obstruction. Eur Radiol. 2017;28(2):522–9. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-017-4987-5
13. Filippiadis D.K., Binkert C., Pellerin O., Hoffmann R.T., Krajina A., Pereira P.L. CIRSE quality assurance document and standards for classification of complications: the CIRSE classification system. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2017;40(8):1141–6. DOI: 10.1007/s00270017-1703-4
14. Poruk K.E., Pawlik T.M., Weiss M.J. Perioperative management of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg. 2015;19(10):1889–99. DOI: 10.1007/s11605-015-2854-8
15. Rizvi S., Eaton J., Yang J.D., Chandrasekhara V., Gores G.J. Emerging technologies for the diagnosis of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Semin Liver Dis. 2018;38(2):160–9. DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1655775
16. Mansour J.C., Aloia T.A., Crane C.H., Heimbach J.K., Nagino M, Vauthey J.-N. Hilar cholangiocarcinoma: expert consensus statement. HPB (Oxford). 2015;17(8):691–9. DOI: 10.1111/hpb.12450
17. Tsalis K., Parpoudi S., Kyziridis D., Ioannidis O., Savvala N., Antoniou N., et al. Klatskin tumors and “Klatskin-mimicking lesions”: our 22-year experience. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2019;111(2):121–8. DOI: 10.17235/reed.2018.5749/2018
18. Augustin A., Steingrüber M., Fluck F., Goetze O., Bley T., Kickuth R. Percutaneous endobiliary forceps biopsy of biliary strictures for histopathologic examination. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2020;26(4):339–44. DOI: 10.5152/dir.2020.19329
19. Tibana T., Grubert R., Fornazari V., Barbosa F., Bacelar B., Oliveira A., et al. The role of percutaneous transhepatic biliary biopsy in the diagnosis of patients with obstructive jaundice: an initial experience. Radiologia Brasileira. 2019;52(4):222–8.
20. Chang H., Liu B., Wang Y., Wang W., Wang W., Li D., et al. Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for the pathological diagnosis of suspected malignant bile duct strictures. Medicine. 2020;99(11):e19545. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019545
21. Li Z., Li T., Ren J., Li W., Ren J., Shui S., et al. Value of percutaneous transhepatic cholangiobiopsy for pathologic diagnosis of obstructive jaundice: analysis of 826 cases. Acta Radiol. 2016;58(1):3–9. DOI: 10.1177/0284185116632386
22. Tapping C., Byass O., Cast J. Cytological sampling versus forceps biopsy during percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage and analysis of factors predicting success. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2011;35(4):883–9. DOI: 10.1007/s00270-011-0193-z
23. Xing G.-S., Geng J.-C., Han X.-W., Dai J.-H., Wu C.-Y. Endobiliary brush cytology during percutaneous transhepatic cholangiodrainage in patients with obstructive jaundice. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2005;4(1):98–103.
24. Kulezneva Yu.V., Melekhina O.V., Musatov A.B., Efanov M.G., Tsvirkun V.V., Nedoluzhko I.Yu., et al. Controversial issues of biliary stenting in patients with proximal biliary obstruction. Annals of HPB surgery. 2021;26(3):79–88 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.16931/1995-5464.2021-3-79-88
25. Kozlov A.V., Polikarpov A.A., Moiseenko A.V., Tarazov P.G., Urbanskiy A.I., Latkin O.E., Granov D.A. Antegrade endobiliary forceps biopsy under the optical coherence tomography control in the diagnosis of Klatskin tumor: preliminary results. Almanac of Clinical Medicine. 2022;50 (In Russ.).
Supplementary files
Review
For citations:
Kozlov A.V., Tarazov P.G., Polikarpov A.A., Moiseenko A.V., Urbansky A.I., Yutkin M.V., Yakshieva G.M., Granov D.A. Antegrade Endobiliary Forceps Biopsy Improves Diagnosis of Klatskin Tumor Compared to Brush Biopsy. Russian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Coloproctology. 2022;32(2):45-54. https://doi.org/10.22416/1382-4376-2022-32-2-45-54