Ilaser Submucous Destruction in the Treatment of Hemorrhoids
https://doi.org/10.22416/1382-4376-2023-33-2-70-78
Abstract
Aim: to improve the results of treatment in patients with hemorrhoids of the 2nd and 3rd stages.
Materials and methods. The prospective study included 60 patients with hemorrhoids of the 2nd and 3rd stages. All patients underwent destruction of internal hemorrhoids with a fiber laser with a diode pump with a wavelength of 1940 nm. The technique is based on the effect of laser energy on the cavernous tissue of the internal hemorrhoidal node and on the terminal branches of the upper rectal artery. The efficiency of the destruction of internal hemorrhoids and the frequency of relapses of the disease were evaluated. The effectiveness of the proposed method was evaluated using anoscopy, measurement of the size of internal hemorrhoidal nodes, transrectal ultrasound with dopplerography. The analysis of the intensity of the pain syndrome, the consumption of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and the assessment of the quality of life on the SF-36 scale was carried out. Sphincterometry was performed in all patients to determine the possible effect of laser radiation on the rectal locking apparatus. To assess the possible causes of complications, a single-factor analysis of the amount of energy transferred to each hemorrhoidal node and the total amount of energy spent on the operation was conducted.
Results. In all patients, by day 7 after surgery, the pain syndrome in 43 patients (75.4 %) corresponded to 0 points according to VAS. In 3 patients (5 %) intraoperative hemorrhage developed. In the early postoperative period, 5 patients (8.3 %) had 7 complications: 5 cases of thrombosis of the external hemorrhoidal node and 2 — of acute urinary retention. The conducted single-factor analysis showed the dependence of the development of complications on the energy transferred to each hemorrhoidal node and its total amount for the entire operation. In terms of up to 6 months, there were no signs of a return of the disease in any case (hemorrhoidal prolapse and blood discharge). The detected hemorrhoids before the operation, a month after the operation, were not visualized, which persisted after 6 months. The performed transrectal ultrasound examination with spectral-wave dopplerography for up to 6 months allowed to diagnose a persistent decrease in blood flow along the terminal branches of the upper rectal artery compared with preoperative values. When performed sphincterometry, there was no change in the parameters of the anal sphincter function compared to preoperative parameters.
Conclusion. The proposed method applying a fiber laser with a diode pump with a wavelength of 1940 nm makes it possible to affect transdermally the internal hemorrhoidal node without damaging the mucosa of the anal canal. The absence of postoperative wounds in the anal canal leads to a decrease in pain syndrome, and by day 7 there are no clinical manifestations of hemorrhoids. The method of laser destruction of internal hemorrhoids can be used in outpatient conditions and can improve the quality of life of patients in the early postoperative period.
About the Authors
S. A. FrolovRussian Federation
Sergey A. Frolov — Dr. Sci. (Med.), Prof., Deputy Director for Scientific and Educational work, Ryzhikh National Medical Research Center of Coloproctology.
123423, Moscow, Salyama Adilya str., 2
D. V. Vyshegorodtsev
Russian Federation
Dmitry V. Vyshegorodtsev — Dr. Sci. (Med.), Prof., Chief of the Department of Minimally Invasive Coloproctology and Inpatient Replacement Technologies, Ryzhikh National Medical Research Center of Coloproctology.
123423, Moscow, Salyama Adilya str., 2
A. M. Kuzminov
Russian Federation
Alexandr M. Kuzminov — Dr. Sci. (Med.), Prof., Head of the Department of Minimally Invasive Coloproctology and Inpatient Replacement Technologies, Ryzhikh National Medical Research Center of Coloproctology.
123423, Moscow, Salyama Adilya str., 2
Yu. L. Trubacheva
Russian Federation
Yuliya L. Trubacheva — Dr. Sci. (Med.), Head of the Ultrasound Diagnostics Department, Ryzhikh National Medical Research Center of Coloproctology.
123423, Moscow, Salyama Adilya str., 2
V. Yu. Korolik
Russian Federation
Vyacheslav Yu. Korolik — Cand. Sci. (Med.), Researcher of the Department of Minimally Invasive Coloproctology and Inpatient Replacement Technologies, Ryzhikh National Medical Research Center of Coloproctology.
123423, Moscow, Salyama Adilya str., 2
I. S. Bogormistrov
Russian Federation
Ilya S. Bogormistrov — Cand. Sci. (Med.), Coloproctologist, Ryzhikh National Medical Research Center of Coloproctology.
123423, Moscow, Salyama Adilya str., 2
I. A. Mukhin
Russian Federation
Ivan A. Mukhin — Physician, Research Consultation Clinic, Ryzhikh National Medical Research Center of Coloproctology.
123423, Moscow, Salyama Adilya str., 2
A. N. Ryndin
Russian Federation
Arseniy N. Ryndin — Resident of the Department of Coloproctology, Ryzhikh National Medical Research Center of Coloproctology.
123423, Moscow, Salyama Adilya str., 2
A. A. Anarbaeva
Russian Federation
Akbermet A. Anarbaeva — Resident of the Department of Coloproctology, Ryzhikh National Medical Research Center of Coloproctology.
123423, Moscow, Salyama Adilya str., 2
References
1. Wang J.Y., Chang-Chien C.R., Chen J.S., Lai C.R., Tang R.P. The role of lasers in hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum. 1991;34(1):78-82. DOI: 10.1007/BF02050213
2. Smith L.E. Hemorrhoidectomy with lasers and other contemporary modalities. Surg Clin North Am. 1992;72(3):665-79. DOI: 10.1016/s0039-6109(16)45740-3
3. Pandini L.C., Nahas S.C., Nahas C.S., Marques C.F., Sobrado C.W., Kiss D.R. Surgical treatment of haemorrhoidal disease with CO2 laser and Milligan-Morgan cold scalpel technique. Colorectal Dis. 2006;8(7):592-5. DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2006.01023.x
4. Leff E.I. Hemorrhoidectomy — laser vs. nonlaser: Outpatient surgical experience. Dis Colon Rectum. 1992;35(8):743-6. DOI: 10.1007/BF02050322
5. Chia Y.W., Darzi A., Speakman C.T., Hill A.D., Jameson J.S., Henry M.M. CO2 laser haemorrhoidectomy — does it alter anorectal function or decrease pain compared to conventional haemorrhoidectomy? Int J Colorectal Dis. 1995;10(1):22-4. DOI: 10.1007/BF00337581
6. Senagore A., Mazier W.P., Luchtefeld M.A., MacKeigan J.M., Wengert T. Treatment of advanced hemorrhoidal disease: A prospective, randomized comparison of cold scalpel vs. contact Nd:YAG laser. Dis Colon Rectum. 1993;36(11):1042-9. DOI: 10.1007/BF02047297
7. Salfi R.A. A new technique for ambulatory hemorrhoidal treatment. Coloproctology. 2009;31(2):99-103. DOI: 10.1007/s00053-009-0009-7
8. Karahaliloglu A. First results after laser obliteration of first and second-degree hemorrhoids. Coloproctology. 2007;29(6):327-36. DOI: 10.1007/s00053-007-7029-y
9. Weyand G., Theis C.S., Fofana A.N., Rudiger F., Gehrke T. Laserhemorrhoidoplasty with 1470 nm diode laser in the treatment of second to fourth degree hemorrhoidal disease — a cohort study with 497 patients. Zentralbl Chir. 2019;144(4):355-63. DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-120449
10. Frolov S.A., Kuzminov A.M., Vyshegorodtsev D.V., Mainovskaya O.A., Trubacheva Yu.L., Fomenko O.Yu., et al. The opportunity of using diode laser with the length of 1940 nm in the treatment of hemorrhoids. Russian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Coloproctology. 2022;32(2):63-72 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.22416/1382-4376-2022-32-2-63-72
11. Titov A.Yu., Kostarev I.V., Blagodarny L.A., Bolkvadze E.E., Khryukin R.Yu. Submucosal laser ablation of internal hemorrhoids. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery = Khirurgiya. Zurnal im. N.I. Pirogova. 2020;3:89-96 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17116/hirurgia202003189
12. Brusciano L., Gambardella C., Terracciano G., Gualtieri G., Schiano di Visconte M., Tolone S., et al. Postoperative discomfort and pain in the management of hemorrhoidal disease: Laser hemorrhoidoplasty, a minimal invasive treatment of symptomatic hemorrhoids. Updates Surg. 2020;72(3):851-7. DOI: 10.1007/s13304-019-00694-5
13. Vasiliev S.V., Nedozimovanyi A.I., Popov D.E., Sorkin R.G., Gor I.V. Laser submucosal destruction of chronic hemorrhoids stage II-III. Koloproktologia. 2019;18(2):21-6. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.33878/2073-7556-2019-18-2-21-26
14. Lakmal K., Basnayake O., Jayarajah U., Samarasekera D.N. Clinical outcomes and effectiveness of laser treatment for hemorrhoids: A systematic review. World J Surg. 2021;45(4):1222-36. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-020-05923-2
15. Mohammed A.F., Hussien Al-Sultani D.A., Flaifel Janabi H.M. A comparative study between laser hemorrhoidoplasty procedure and conventional hemorrhoidectomy. Journal of University of Babylon for Pure and Applied Sciences. 2019;27(1):69-86.
16. Alsisy A.A., Alkhateep Ya.M., Salem I.E. Comparative study between intrahemorrhoidal diode laser treatment and Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy. Menoufia Med J. 2019;32(2):560-5. DOI: 10.4103/mmj.mmj_101_18
17. Rahman A.Z., Rahman T., Hasan M., Chandra S. Haemorrhoidal LASER Procedure (HeLP) — A painless treatment for haemorrhoid. Journal of Bangladesh College of Physicians and Surgeons. 2019;38(1):18-22. DOI: 10.3329/jbcps.v38i1.44684
18. Crea N., Pata G., Lippa M., Chiesa D., Gregorini M.E., Gandolfi P. Hemorrhoidal laser procedure: Short- and long-term results from a prospective study. Am J Surg. 2014;208(1):21-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.10.020
19. De Nardi P., Tamburini A.M., Gazzetta P.G., Lemma M., Pascariello A., Asteria C.R. Hemorrhoid laser procedure for second- and third-degree hemorrhoids: Results from a multicenter prospective study. Tech Coloproctol. 2016;20(7):455-9. DOI: 10.1007/s10151-016-1479-6
20. Ram E., Bachar G.N., Goldes Y., Joubran S., Rath-Wolfson L. Modified Doppler-guided laser procedure for the treatment of second- and third-degree hemorrhoids. Laser Ther. 2018;27(2):137-42. DOI: 10.5978/islsm.18-OR-14
21. Faes S., Pratsinis M., Hasler-Gehrer S., Keerl A., Nocito A. Short- and long-term outcomes of laser haemorrhoidoplasty for grade II-III haemorrhoidal disease. Colorectal Dis. 2019;21(6):689-96. DOI: 10.1111/codi.14572
22. Giamundo P., Braini A., Calabro' G., Crea N., De Nardi P., Fabiano F., et al. Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal dearterialization with laser (HeLP): A prospective analysis of data from a multicenter trial. Tech Coloproctol. 2018;22(8):635-43. DOI: 10.1007/s10151-018-1839-5
23. Maloku H., Gashi Z., Lazovic R., Islami H., Juniku-Shkololli A. Laser hemorrhoidoplasty procedure vs open surgical hemorrhoidectomy: A trial comparing 2 treatments for hemorrhoids of third and fourth degree. Acta Inform Med. 2014;22(6):365-7. DOI: 10.5455/aim.2014.22.365-367
24. Maloku H., Lazovic R., Terziqi H. Laser hemorrhoidoplasty versus Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy: Short term outcome. Vojnosanitetski pregled. 2019;76(1):8-12. DOI: 10.2298/VSP170125070M
25. Boarini P., Boarini L.R., Candelaria P.A., Lima E.M., Boarini M.R. LASER hemorrhoidal dearterialization. J Coloproctol. 2017;37(1):38-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcol.2016.12.001
26. Giamundo P., Salfi R., Geraci M., Tibaldi L., Murru L., Valente M. The hemorrhoid laser procedure technique vs rubber band ligation: A randomized trial comparing 2 mini-invasive treatments for second- and third-degree hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011;54(6):693-8. DOI: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3182112d58
27. Nazari M.S., Hedayati M.K. Comparison of intrahemorrhoidal coagulation with 980 nanometer diode laser and Milligan Morgan hemorrhoidectomy: A randomized clinical trial. J Clin Res Gov. 2015;4:1-4.
28. Naderan M., Shoar S., Nazari M., Elsayed A., Mahmoodzadeh H., Khorgami Z. A randomized controlled trial comparing laser intra-hemorrhoidal coagulation and Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy. J Invest Surg. 2017;30(5):325-31. DOI: 10.1080/08941939.2016.1248304
29. Abdulkarim A., Misoi B., Gathege D. Laser hemorrhoidoplasty: Experience at Aga Khan University Hospital. Ann African Surg. 2020;17(2). DOI: 10.4314/aas.v17i2.8
Supplementary files
Review
For citations:
Frolov S.A., Vyshegorodtsev D.V., Kuzminov A.M., Trubacheva Yu.L., Korolik V.Yu., Bogormistrov I.S., Mukhin I.A., Ryndin A.N., Anarbaeva A.A. Ilaser Submucous Destruction in the Treatment of Hemorrhoids. Russian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Coloproctology. 2023;33(2):70-78. https://doi.org/10.22416/1382-4376-2023-33-2-70-78