Pantoprazole – safety in drug-drug interaction
Abstract
The aim of review. To carry out comparative analysis of metabolic pathways of proton pump inhibitors (PPI), to determine the agent with lowest effect on activity of cytochrome CYP2C19 isoenzyme for improvement of safety of combined treatment by pharmaceuticals metabolized by this isoenzyme.
Key points. Pantoprazole is metabolized by CYP2C19 and CYP3A4, however, it has the lowest affinity to these enzymes of all PPIs. The primary metabolite of pantoprazole (the CYP system product 4-hydroxypantoprazole) enters next cytosolic phase of biotransformation i.e. conjugation to sulfate. Second phase of pantoprazole biotransformation does not depend on cytochrome system. It explains lower degree of interaction to CYP2C19 and CYP3A4-metabolized drugs for pantoprazole, in comparison to other PPIs. This is proved by relative safety of clopidogrel to pantoprazole combination in patients with cardio-vascular diseases, demonstrated in clinical studies of the last years.
Conclusion. Data of investigations, available for the present time, in vitro and in vivo allow to consider pantoprazole (Nolpaza) as the most safe drug for application in complex therapy to reduce the drug interaction-associated adverse effects.
About the Authors
E. V. ShikhRussian Federation
D. A. Sychev
Russian Federation
References
1. Блюме Х., Донат Ф., Варнке А., Шуг Б.С. Фармакокинетические лекарственные взаимодействия с участием ингибиторов протонной помпы: Реф. канд. мед. наук. Е.Б. Третьяк.
2. Бордин Д.С. Безопасность лечения как критерий выбора ингибитора протонной помпы больному гастроэзофагеальной рефлюксной болезнью // Consilium Medicum. – 2010. – Т. 12, № 8.
3. Исаков В.А. Безопасность ингибиторов протонного насоса при длительном применении // Клин. фармакол. тер. – 2004. – № 13 (1).
4. Кукес В.Г., Грачев С.В., Сычев Д.А., Раменская Г.В. Метаболизм лекарственных средств: научные основы персонализированной медицины. – М.: ГЭОТАРМедиа, 2008. – 304 с.
5. Милюхина Г. Безопасность антитромбоцитарной терапии: выбор ингибитора протонной помпы. Medicine Review 2012; 2 (20):42–5.
6. Abelo A, Andersson TB, Antonsson M, et al. Steroselective metabolism of omeprazole by human cytochrome P450 enzymes. Drug Metab Dispos 2000, 972.
7. Andersson T, Miners JO, Veronese ME, et al. Identification of human liver cytochrome P450 isoforms mediating omeprazole metabolism. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1993; 36:521–30.
8. Bliesath H, Huber R, Steinijans VW, et al. Lack of pharmacokinetic interaction between pantoprazole and diclofenac. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther 1996; 34:152–6.
9. Drewelow B, Schaffler K, Reitmeir P. Superior interaction profile of pantoprazole vs esomeprazole after single dose diazepam regarding pharmacodynamic (PD) and kinetic (PK) parameters. Can J Gastroenterol 2006; 20 suppl. A:144
10. Ferron GM, Paul JC, Fruncillo RJ, et al. Lack of pharmacokinetic interaction between oral pantoprazole and cisapride in healthy adults. J Clin Pharmacol 1999;
11. :945–50.
12. Hassan–lin M, Andersson T, Niazi M, et al. A pharmacokinetic study comparing single and repeated oral doses of 20 mg and 40 mg omeprazole and its two optical isomers, S–meprazole (esomeprazole) and R–meprazole, in healthy subjects. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2005; 60:779–84.
13. Horai Y, Kimura M, Furuie H, et al. Pharmacodynamic effects and kinetic disposition of rabeprazole in relation to CYP 2C19 genotypes. Aliment Pharmcol Ther 2001; 15:793–803.
14. Howden CW. Clinical pharmacology of omeprazole. Clin Pharmacokinet 1991; 20:38–49.
15. Huber R, Hartmann M, Bliesath H, et al. Pharmacokinetics of pantoprazole in man. Int J Clin Pharmacol Therapeut 1996; 34:185–94.
16. Ко J, Sukhova N, et al. Evaluation of omeprazole and lansoprazole as inhibitors of cytochrome P450 isoforms. Drug Metab Dispos 1997; 25 (7), 853–62.
17. Steinijans V.W., Huber R., Hartmann M. et al. Lack of pantoprazole drug interaction in man: an updated review. Int J Clin Pharmacol and Therapeutics 1996; 34, suppl 1, 33–50.
18. Li XQ, Andersson TB, Ahlstrom M, et al. Comparison of inhibitory effects of the proton pump–inhibiting drugs omeprazole, esomeprazole, lansoprazole, pantoprazole, and rabeprazole on human cytochrome P450 activities. Drug Metab Dispos 2004; 32:821–7.
19. Lorf T, Ramadori G, Ringe B, et al. Pantoprazole does not affect ciclosporin A blood concentration in kidney– transplant patients. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2000; 55:733–5.
20. Robinson M., Horn J. Clinical Pharmacology of Proton Pump Inhibitors. What the Practising Physician Needs to Know. Drugs 2003; 63 (24):2739–54.
21. Meyer UA. Metabolic interactions of the proton–pump inhibitors lansoprazole, omeprazole and pantoprazole with other drugs. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1996; 8, suppl. 1:21–5.
22. Meyer UA. Overview of enzymes of drug metabolism. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm 1996; 24:449–59.
23. Pearce RE, Rodrigues AD, Goldstein JA, et al. Identification of the human P450 enzymes involved in lansoprazole metabolism. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1996; 277:805–16.
24. Pirmohamed M, James S, Meakin S, et al. Adverse drug reactions as cause of admission to hospital: prospective analysis of 18 820 patients. BMJ 2004; 329 (7456):15–9.
25. Pump Inhibitors. What the practising physician needs to know. Drugs 2003; 63 (24):2739–54.
26. Shapiro LE, Shear NH. Drug interactions: proteins, pumps, and P-450s. J Am Acad Dermatol 2002; 47:467–84.
27. Simon WA. Pantoprazole: which cytochrome P450 isoenzymes are involved in its biotransformation? [abstract]. Gut 1995; 37:1177.
28. Thong BY, Tan TC. Epidemiology and risk factors for drug allergy. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2011; 71 (5):684–700.
29. Troger U, Stotzel B, Martens–Lobenhoffer J, et al. Severe myalgia from an interaction between treatments with pantoprazole and methotrexate. BMJ 2002; 324:1497.
30. http: // www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/Postmar- ket Drug Safe tyInfor mationfor Patien tsandP roviders / ucm190836.htm.
31. 17/03/2010. EMA 174948/2010. Interaction between clopidogrel and proton-pump ingibitors.
Review
For citations:
Shikh E.V., Sychev D.A. Pantoprazole – safety in drug-drug interaction. Russian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Coloproctology. 2012;22(5):4-12. (In Russ.)