Hymecromone Administration in Real Clinical Practice: Results of the Prospective Multicentre Observational Study in the Republic of Kazakhstan
https://doi.org/10.22416/1382-4376-2021-31-5-34-50
Abstract
Introduction. This multicentre prospective non-interventional observational study was conducted to obtain additional data about Odeston efficacy and safety in routine clinical practice. The objectives of the study included collection of clinical characteristics of patients, evaluation of Odeston effects in treatment of biliary pain and changes in the gallbladder emptying, evaluation of compliance to therapy, and treatment effect satisfaction.
Materials and methods. The study was conducted from July 2020 to April 2021 at the premises of 60 study sites in 4 cities of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Patients having indications for Odeston administration according to the patient leaflet were enrolled. The study included 2 patient visits and an intermediate telephone contact. A visual analogue scale and RAPID questionnaire were used to characterise biliary pain; severity of associated symptoms, bowel habit and a quality of life according the SF-12 were also assessed. A rate of a ≥50 % reduction in symptom severity was used as a primary efficacy criterion; a rate of a ≥10 improvement in the SF-12 quality of life score was used as a secondary efficacy criterion. Compliance to treatment was evaluated using a number of days on Odeston. Treatment satisfaction was assessed using 5 grades.
Results. 877 patients, 68.2 % of females and 31.8 % of males, were included in the study; the mean age was 46.0 ± 14.9 years. Primary functional biliary disorder was diagnosed in 65.3 % of patients, chronic non-calculous cholecystitis — 51.4 %, uncomplicated gallbladder disease — in 8.9 %, biliary sludge — 38.4 %, sphincter of Oddi functional disorder — 5.3 % of patients. A dose of Odeston was prescribed at the discretion of the physician. Group A patients received 600 mg (n = 89), group B received 1200 mg of Odeston a day (n = 788). In group B, an incidence of pronounced pain interference with daily living activities was higher. In both groups, the mean VAS scores were reduced to 1 point on treatment, a primary efficacy criterion was achieved in 77.3 % of patients in group A and in 79.8 % of patients in group B, р < 0.05. In both groups, a reduction in the incidence of constipation and diarrhea (р < 0,001) and an increase in the mean scores of physical and mental functioning were noted (р < 0.001, though a secondary efficacy criterion was not achieved (a ≥10 change in the SF-12 score). A prevalence of ultrasonographic sings of biliary sludge was reduced, and an increased gallbladder emptying was observed (p < 0.001). 77.4 % of patients in a total group of patients reported about drug administration for 21 days. A number of patients who were completely satisfied with treatment was higher in group B (p = 0.027).
Conclusions. It was found that biliary pain interfered with daily living activities and commonly accompanied by other symptoms of gastrointestinal dysmotility. Odeston effectively reduces the severity of biliary pain, corrects dyspeptic disorders and normalizes stool pattern in patients with functional and organic diseases of the biliary system. Treatment satisfaction was higher with a dose of 1200 mg a day, particularly in more pronounced interference of pain with daily living activities.
About the Authors
A. V. NersesovRussian Federation
Alexander V. Nersesov — Dr. Sci. (Med.), Prof., Head of the Chair of Gastroenterology
Almaty, Ayteke bi str., 120
D. A. Kaybullaeva
Russian Federation
Dzhamilya A. Kaybullaeva — Cand. Sci. (Med.), Assoc. Prof., Chair of Gastroenterology
Almaty, Ayteke bi str., 120
V. S. Rakhmetova
Russian Federation
Venera S. Rakhmetova — Dr. Sci. (Med.), Prof., Chair of Internal Medicine
Nur-Sultan, Beybitshilik str., 49-A
I. A. Lozinskaya
Russian Federation
Irina A. Lozinskaya — Physician (gastroenterology), Head of Pathology Centre
Karaganda, Erubaevoy str., 15
A. K. Kurmangalieva
Russian Federation
Asem K. Kurmangalieva — Physician (gastroenterology)
Chimkent, Mayly Kozha str., 4
V. S. Ayupova
Russian Federation
Venera S. Ayupova — Physician (gastroenterology)
Almaty, Makataeva str., 141
A. B. Orazbaeva
Russian Federation
Aida B. Orazbaeva — Physician (gastroenterology, infectiology)
Nur-Sultan, Mangilik El str., 37
A. K. Kanabaeva
Russian Federation
Ayzhan K. Kanabaeva — Physician (gastroenterology)
Almaty, Koktem 3 mikrorayon, 17
Yu. O. Shulpekova
Russian Federation
Yuliya O. Shulpekova — Cand. Sci. (Med.), Assoc. Prof., Chair of Internal Disease Propaedeutics, Gastroenterology and Hepatology
119435, Moscow, Pogodinskaya str., 1, bld. 1
References
1. Cotton P.B., Elta G.H., Carter C.R., Pasricha P.J., Corazziari E.S. Rome IV. Gallbladder and Sphincter of Oddi Disorders. Gastroenterology. 2016:S0016- 5085(16)00224-9. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.02.033
2. Dias I.H.K., Milic I., Heiss C., Ademowo O.S., Polidori M.C., Devitt A., Griffiths H.R. Inflammation, Lipid (Per)oxidation, and Redox Regulation. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2020;33(3):166–90. DOI: 10.1089/ars.2020.8022
3. Aziz I., Palsson O.S., Törnblom H., Sperber A.D., Whitehead W.E., Simrén M. The Prevalence and Impact of Overlapping Rome IV-Diagnosed Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders on Somatization, Quality of Life, and Healthcare Utilization: A Cross-Sectional General Population Study in Three Countries. Am J Gastroenterol. 2018;113(1):86–96. DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2017.421
4. Jung S.W., Joo M.S., Choi H.C., Jang S.I., Woo Y.S., Kim J.B., et al. Epigastric symptoms of gallbladder dyskinesia mistaken for functional dyspepsia: Retrospective observational study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96(16):e6702. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006702
5. Latenstein C.S.S., de Jong J.J., Eppink J.J., Lantinga M.A., van Laarhoven C.J.H.M., de Reuver P.R., Drenth J.P.H. Prevalence of dyspepsia in patients with cholecystolithiasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;31(8):928–34. DOI: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000001463
6. Abeysuriya V., Deen K.I., Navarathne N.M. Biliary microlithiasis, sludge, crystals, microcrystallization, and usefulness of assessment of nucleation time. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2010;9(3):248–53.
7. Zackria R., Lopez R.A. Postcholecystectomy Syndrome. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing. 2021.
8. Takeda S., Aburada M. The choleretic mechanism of coumarin compounds and phenolic compounds. J Pharmacobiodyn. 1981;4(9):724–34. DOI: 10.1248/bpb1978.4.724
9. Lee W.H., Fujiwara M. Spasmolytic action of 4-methylumbelliferone in isolated guinea-pig’s gallbladder. Jpn J Pharmacol. 1971;21(6):827–9. DOI: 10.1254/jjp.21.827
10. Ahmad T., Shah A.J., Roberts R. Mechanisms mediating the vasodilatory effects of juglone in porcine isolated coronary artery. Eur J Pharmacol. 2020;866:172815. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2019.172815
11. Najmanová I., Doseděl M., Hrdina R., Anzenbacher P., Filipský T., Říha M., Mladěnka P. Cardiovascular effects of coumarins besides their antioxidant activity. Curr Top Med Chem. 2015;15(9):830–49. DOI: 10.2174/1568026615666150220112437
12. Abate A., Dimartino V., Spina P., Costa P.L., Lombardo C., Santini A., et al. Hymecromone in the treatment of motor disorders of the bile ducts: a multicenter, doubleblind, placebo-controlled clinical study. Drugs Exp Clin Res. 2001;27(5–6):223–31.
13. Walter P., Seidel W. Untersuchungen über die Wirkung von-4-Methyl-umbelliferon (Hymecromon) bei Patienten nach operativer Revision der Gallenwege [Studies on the effect of 4-methyl-umbelliferon (Hymecromone) in patients following surgical revision of the biliary pathways]. Chirurg. 1979;50(7):436–40.
14. Draese K., Hirche H. Pharmakologische Beeinflussung der Sphincter Oddi-Motorik. Postoperative Elektromanometrie der Gallenwege [Pharmacological effects on the motor activity of Oddi’s sphincter. Postoperative electromanometric measurements of the bile ducts]. Fortschr Med. 1980;98(39):1529–33.
15. Quaranta S., Rossetti S., Camarri E. Studio clinico in doppia cecità tra imercromone e placebo nei disordini motori delle vie biliari dopo colecistectomia [Double-blind clinical study on hymecromone and placebo in motor disorders of the bile ducts after cholecystectomy]. Clin Ter. 1984;108(6):513–7.
16. Hoffmann R.M., Schwarz G., Pohl C. Bile acid-independent effect of hymecromone on bile secretion and common bile duct motility. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2005;130:1938–43.
17. Okhlobystin A.V., Tatarkina M.A., Okhlobystina O.Z., Budzinskiy S.A., Pavlov P.V., Labut L.A. Hymecromone Efficacy in the Treatment of Biliary Pancreatitis. Rus J Gastroenterol Hepatol Coloproctol. 2019;29(5):26–35 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.22416/1382-4376-2019-29-5-26-35
18. Coccia G., Michetti P., Rossetti S., Dodero M. Studio a doppia cecità cross-over tra l’imecromone ed il placebo nel trattamento della sindrome dispeptica [Double-blind crossover study of imecromone and placebo in the treatment of dyspeptic syndrome]. Minerva Dietol Gastroenterol. 1985;31(2):293–8.
19. Ivashkin V.T., Mayev I.V., Baranskaya Y.K., Okhlobystin A.V., Shulpekova Yu.O., Trukhmanov A.S., et al. Gallstone disease diagnosis and treatment: guidelines of the Russian gastroenterological association. Rus J Gastroenterol Hepatol Coloproctol. 2016;26(3):64–80 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.22416/1382-4376-2016-26-3-64-80
20. Ivashkin V.T., Mayev I.V., Shulpekova Yu.O., Baranskaya Y.K., Okhlobystin A.V., Trukhmanov A.S., et al. Diagnostics and treatment of biliary dyskinesia: clinical guidelines of the Russian gastroenterological Association. Rus J Gastroenterol Hepatol Coloproctol. 2018;28(3):63–80 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.22416/1382-4376-2018-28-3-63-80
Review
For citations:
Nersesov A.V., Kaybullaeva D.A., Rakhmetova V.S., Lozinskaya I.A., Kurmangalieva A.K., Ayupova V.S., Orazbaeva A.B., Kanabaeva A.K., Shulpekova Yu.O. Hymecromone Administration in Real Clinical Practice: Results of the Prospective Multicentre Observational Study in the Republic of Kazakhstan. Russian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Coloproctology. 2021;31(5):34-50. https://doi.org/10.22416/1382-4376-2021-31-5-34-50