Evaluation of the Clinical Efficacy of Prednisolone in the Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases with Different Dosage Methods
https://doi.org/10.22416/1382-4376-2022-32-6-40-46
Abstract
Aim: to investigate the clinical efficacy of two methods of oral dosing of prednisolone (in mg and mg/kg) for the induction of remission for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD) using the technology of constructing and evaluating the effectiveness function (dose-effect relationship).
Material and methods. In this study were included 86 patients aged from 18 to 65 years with moderate or severe active inflammatory bowel disease (61 — UC, 25 — CD). All patients were treated with prednisolone at an initial daily dose from 30 to 60 mg with a subsequent tapering of dose. The clinical response to treatment was evaluated at the time of complete withdrawal of prednisolone using the generally accepted criteria. Two efficiency functions were constructed, compared and analyzed: the first — at the initial dosage of prednisolone in mg and the second calculating the dose in mg/kg of patient weight. The patients' body weight ranged from 41 to 98 kg. The “dose-effect” relationship for prednisolone was constructed with statistical transformation of the baseline clinical data and a quantitative expression of the actual doses and alternative responses into a graph of the effectiveness function. The mean value at each point was estimated based on the regression kernel scoring method.
Results. Two graphs of the “dose-effect” of prednisolone in mg and mg/kg of patient weight were constructed. The optimal clinically effective dose (OCED) when calculated in mg/kg of weight was 0.70 ± 0.01 (0.68 + 0.72) mg/kg with the corresponding effect 79.25 ± 6.26 (66.62 91.88) %. When two graphs in mg and mg / kg of weight were superimposed, it is shown that when an initial dose of 40 mg is prescribed without taking into account the patient's weight, the effect of therapy will be 25 % lower. Prescribing a dose of 60 mg per day without weight will be optimal for patients with a body weight of 85-90 kg. With a lower body weight, the clinical effect will not decrease, but the likelihood of recognized side effects of prednisolone should be expected in proportion to the decrease in body weight.
Conclusion. The clinical efficacy of two methods of prednisolone dosing (mg and mg/kg) for patients with IBD during the first induction course was compared.
Using a new technology for constructing and evaluating the effectiveness function (dose-effect relationship) allowed us to prove a reliable relationship between the body weight of patients with the clinical effect of prednisolone in patients with UC and CD. Based on the analysis of the dose-effect relationship, the optimal clinically effective dose of prednisolone for patients with UC and CD during the first induction course was established, equal to 0.70 mg/kg, which can be recommended for use in clinical practice for calculating individual doses.
About the Authors
O. P. AlekseevaRussian Federation
Olga P. Alekseeva — Dr. Sci. (Med.), Prof., Head of the Gastroenterological Center of the Nizhny Novgorod Regional Clinical Hospital named after N.A. Semashko.
603093, Nizhny Novgorod, Rodionova str., 190
S. V. Krishtopenko
Russian Federation
Sergey V. Krishtopenko — Dr. Sci. (Med.), Gastroenterologist, Nizhny Novgorod Regional Clinical Hospital named after N.A. Semashko.
603093, Nizhny Novgorod, Rodionova str., 190
A. A. Alekseeva
Russian Federation
Anastasia A. Alekseeva — clinical resident (2-nd year) of Hospital Therapy and General Practice named after V.G. Vogralik, Privolzhsky Research Medical University.
603005, Nizhny Novgorod, Minina i Pozharskogo sq., 10/1
References
1. Harbord M., Eliakim R., Bettenworth D., Karmiris K., Katsanos K., Kopylov U., et al. Third European Evidence-based Consensus on Diagnosis and Management of Ulcerative Colitis. Part 2: Current Management. J. Crohns Colitis. 2017;11(7):769-84. DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjx009
2. Barrett K., Saxena S., Pollok R. Using corticosteroids appropriately in inflammatory bowel disease: a guide for primary care. Br J Gen Pract. 2018;68(675):497—8. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp18X699341
3. Raine T., Bonovas S., Burisch J., Kucharzik T., Adamina M., Annese V., et al. ECCO Guidelines on Therapeutics in Ulcerative Colitis: Medical Treatment. J Crohns Colitis. 2022;16(1):2-17. DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjab178
4. Ferretti F., Cannatelli R., Monico M.C., Maconi G., Ardizzone S. An Update on Current Pharmacotherapeutic Options for the Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis. J Clin Med. 2022;11(9):2302. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11092302
5. Lamb C.A., Kennedy N.A., Raine T., Hendy P.A., Smith P.J., Limdi J.K., et al. British Society of Gastroenterology consensus guidelines on the management of inflammatory bowel disease in adults. Gut. 2019;68(S.3):s1—106. DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-318484
6. Ko C.W., Singh S., Feuerstein J.D., Falck-Ytter C., Falck-Ytter Y., Cross R.K., et al. American Gastroenterological Association Institute Clinical Guidelines Committee. AGA Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Mild-to-Moderate Ulcerative Colitis. Gastroenterology. 2019;156(3):748-64. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.12.009
7. Kornbluth A., Sachar D.B. Ulcerative Colitis Practice Guidelines in Adults: American College of Gastroenterology, Practice Parameters Committee. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105(3):501-23. DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2009.727
8. Lichtenstein G.R., Loftus E.V., Isaacs K.L., Regueiro M.D., Gerson L.B., Sands B.E. ACG Clinical Guideline: Management of Crohn's Disease in Adults. Am J Gastroenterol. 2018;113(4):481-517. DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2018.27
9. Ivashkin V.T., Shelygin Yu. A., Khalif I.L., Belousova E.A., Shifrin O.S., Abdulganieva D.I., et al. Recommendations of the Russian Gastroenterological Association and Association of Coloproctologists of Russia on diagnosis and treatment of ulcerative colitis. Coloproctology. 2017;1(59):6-30 (In Russ.).
10. Ivashkin V.T., Shelygin Yu.A., Khalif I.L., Belousova E.A., Shifrin O.S., Abdulganieva D.I., et al. Recommendations of the Russian Gastroenterological Association and Association of Coloproctologists of Russia on diagnosis and treatment of Crohn's disease. Coloproctology. 2017;2(60):7-30 (In Russ.).
11. Язвенный колит. Министерство здравоохранения Российской Федерации клинические рекомендации, взрослые: К51, ID 193 (Российская гастроэнтерологическая ассоциация, Ассоциация колопроктологов России), 2020. URL: https://cr.minzdrav.gov.ru/recomend/193_1
12. Болезнь Крона. Министерство здравоохранения Российской Федерации, клинические рекомендации, взрослые: К50, ID 176 (Российская гастроэнтерологическая ассоциация, Ассоциация колопроктологов России), 2020. URL: https://cr.minzdrav.gov.ru/recomend/176_1
13. Schroeder K.W., Tremaine W.J., Ilstrup D.M. Coated oral 5-aminosalicylic acid therapy for mildly to moderately active ulcerative colitis. A randomized study. N Engl J Med. 1987;317(26):1625-9. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM198712243172603
14. Best W.R., Becktel J.M., Singleton J.W., Kern F.Jr. Development of a Crohn's disease activity index. National Cooperative Crohn's Disease Study. Gastroenterology. 1976;70(3):439-44. DOI: 10.1016/0016-5085(79)90384
15. D'Haens G., Sandborn W.J., Feagan B.J., Geboes K., Hanauer S.B., Irvine E.J., et al. A review of activity indices and efficacy end points for clinical trials of medical therapy in adults with ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology. 2007;132(2):763-86. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.12.038
16. Krishtopenko S.V., Tikhov M.S., Popova E.B. The dose effect. Moscow: Medicine Pub; 2008 (In Russ.).
17. Hardle V. Applied non-parametric regression (Translated from English). Moscow: Mir; 1993 (In Russ.).
18. Lakin G.F. Biometry. Moscow: Higher School, 1990 (In Russ.).
19. Summers R.W, Switz D.M, Sessions J.T. Jr., Becktel J.M., Best W.R., Kern F. Jr, Singleton J.W. National Cooperative Crohn's Disease Study: results of drug treatment. Gastroenterology. 1979;77(4 Pt 2): 847-69.
20. Malchow H., Ewe K., Brandes J.W, Goebell H., Ehms H., Sommer H., Jesdinsky H. European Cooperative Crohn's Disease Study (ECCDS): results of drug treatment. Gastroenterology. 1984;86(2):249-66.
21. Turner D., Walsh C.M., Steinhart A.H., Griffiths A.M. Response to corticosteroids in severe ulcerative colitis: a systematic review of the literature and a meta-regression. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;5(1):103-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2006.09.033
22. Faubion W.A. Jr., Loftus E.V.Jr., Harmsen W.S., Zinsmeister A.R., Sandborn W.J. The natural history of corticosteroid therapy for inflammatory bowel disease: a population-based study. Gastroenterology. 2001;121(2):255-60. DOI: 10.1053/gast.2001.26279
23. Munkholm P., Langholz E., Davidsen M., Binder V. Frequency of glucocorticoid resistance and dependency in Crohn's disease. Gut; 1994;35(3):360-2. DOI: 10.1136/gut.35.3.360
24. Baron J.H., Connell A.M., Kanaghinis T.G., Lennard-Jones J.E., Jones A.F. Out-patient treatment of ulcerative colitis. Comparison between three doses of oral prednisone. Br Med J. 1962;2(5302):441-3. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.2.5302.441
25. Pickup M.E. Clinical pharmacokinetics of prednisone and prednisolone. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1979;4(2):111-28. DOI: 10.2165/00003088-197904020-00004
26. Teshima C., Fedorak R.N. Are there differences in type, dosage, and method of administration for the systemic steroids in IBD treatment? Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2008;14(S.2):S216-8. DOI: 10.1002/ibd.20728
Supplementary files
Review
For citations:
Alekseeva O.P., Krishtopenko S.V., Alekseeva A.A. Evaluation of the Clinical Efficacy of Prednisolone in the Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases with Different Dosage Methods. Russian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Coloproctology. 2022;32(6):40-46. https://doi.org/10.22416/1382-4376-2022-32-6-40-46