Preview

Russian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Coloproctology

Advanced search

Treatment of chronic hepatitis C by cepeginterferon alpha-2b in combination to ribavirin

Abstract

Aim of investigation. Comparative study of efficacy and safety of Algeron in dozes of 1,5 and 2,0 mkg/kg and PegIntron in combination to ribavirin within combined mode of treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) with subsequent assessment of therapeutic doze of Algeron.

Material and methods. In open randomized «noninferiority» clinical study of II–III phase 150 previously untreated by interferon adult CHC patients (genotypes 1, 2, 3) were randomized in three medical groups: Algeron 1,5 mkg/kg, Algeron 2,0 mkg/kg and active control group — PegIntron 1,5 mkg/kg. All patients received ribavirin 800-1400 mg/day for 24-48 wks in relation to genotype. Early virologic response (EVR) rate was used as a primary endpoint of efficacy. Intentto-treat the analysis was applied at rating of obtained results.

Results. The comparative analysis has demonstrated, that EVR at the 12-th week in group of Algeron 1,5 mkg/kg was observed in 100 % of patients with genotypes 2/3 and in 88,5% of patients with genotype 1. In Algeron 2,0 mkg/kg group it was registered at 95,7 and 92,6 % of patients respectively, in control group – in 95,5 and 82,1% (р> 0,05 in comparison of all scores between groups). As no distinctions in Algeron efficacy were revealed, at more favorable safety profile of low doze, the therapeutic doze of 1,5 mkg /kg/wk has been chosen. After the first 12 wks of treatment all patients of the 1-st and 2-nd groups received Algeron in the chosen doze of 1,5 mkg/kg up to termination of the treatment course. Therefore the response at the end of treatment (direct virologic response, DVR) and sustained virologic response (SVR) were estimated for patients of the 1-st and 2-nd groups in common (n=100). Among patients with HCV 2/3 genotypes, receiving Algeron, DVR was observed in 93,6%, in control group – in 81,8%, in patients with the 1-st virus genotype — in 83 and 71,4 % of cases respectively (р>0,05 at comparison of all scores between groups). In patients with 2/3 genotypes HCV, at Algeron therapy, SVR was reached in 83 % of cases, in PegIntron group — in 81,8 %. In patients with the 1-st virus genotype it was observed in 67,9 and 57,1 % respectively (p> 0,05). The adverse events were registered during treatment by Algeron, in dose-dependent manner, however their frequency had did not exceed that in patients receiving standard PegIntron dozes.

Conclusions. Study results prove high efficacy and safety of Algeron in suppression of hepatitis C virus replication and allow to recommend its application at previously untreated patients with CHC in a doze of 1,5 mkg/kg/wk for 24-48 wks in relation to genotype HCV.

About the Authors

M. V. Mayevskaya
State educational government-financed institution of higher professional education «Sechenov First Moscow state medical university», Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Mayevskaya Marina V. — MD, PhD, professor, Chair of internal diseases propedeutics, medical faculty

119991, Moscow, Trubetskaya street, 8, bld. 2



O. O. Znoyko
State educational government financed institution of higher professional education «Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry»; «Infectious disease clinical hospital N 1»
Russian Federation

Znojko Olga O. — MD, PhD, professor of chair of infectious diseases and epidemiology, infectious disease physician

125367, Moscow, Volokolamskoye highway, 63



Ye. A. Klimova
State educational government financed institution of higher professional education «Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry»
Russian Federation


S. L. Maximov
State educational government financed institution of higher professional education «Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry»
Russian Federation


S. N. Kizhlo
Saint Petersburg Federal budget healthcare institution «National Center for AIDS and infectious diseases prevention and control»
Russian Federation


N. A. Petrochenkova
State educational government-financed institution of higher professional education «Smolensk state medical academy»
Russian Federation


F. I. Nagimova
State autonomic healthcare institution « National Center for AIDS and infectious diseases prevention and control», Ministry of heathcare of Tatarstan republic
Russian Federation


Yu. N. Linkova
CJSC «BIOKAD»
Russian Federation


References

1. Моисеев С.В. Лечение хронического гепатита С: результаты рандомизированных контролируемых исследований. Инфекционные болезни 2010; 3 (8): 52–7.

2. Рекомендации по диагностике и лечению взрослых больных гепатитом С. Под ред. экспертной группы РФ по вопросам вирусных гепатитов; 2013.

3. Тукач А.И., Фитилев С.Б., Шкребнева И.И., и др. Динамика уровня неоптерина в крови после однократного введения нарастающих доз препарата Альгерон у здоровых добровольцев. ХХ Рос. нац. конгресс «Человек и лекарство» 13–15 апреля 2013 г.: Сборник материалов конгресса, с. 444–5.

4. Фитилев С.Б., Тукач А.И., Шкребнева И.И., и др. Определение терапевтической дозы Альгерона в комбинации его с рибавирином. ХХ Рос. нац. конгресс «Человек и лекарство» 13–15 апреля 2013 г.: Сборник материалов конгресса, с. 453.

5. AASLD Practice guidelines: diagnosis, management, and treatment of hepatitis C: An Update. Hepatology, April 2009; 1335–74.

6. Bartosch B., Thimme R., Blum H.E, Zoulim F. Hepatitis C virus-induced hepatocarcinogenesis. J Hepatol 2009; 51:810–20.

7. Chernoskaya T., Rudenko E., Fitilev S., et al. New pegylated interferon for the treatment of hepatitis C virus: Development, characterization and results of phase I study with dose escalation in healthy volunteers. Cytоkine. Vol. 59, Issue 3, September 2012.

8. Coverdale S. A., Khan M. H., Byth K., Lin R., Weltman M., George J., et al. Effects of interferon treatment response on liver complications of chronic hepatitis C: 9-year follow-up study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004; 99:636–44.

9. Donato F., Boffetta P., Puoti M. A meta-analysis of epidemiological studies on the combined effect of hepatitis B and C virus infections in causing hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Cancer 1998; 75:347–54.

10. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of hepatitis C virus infection. Hepatol 2011; (55):245–64.

11. Ghany M. G., Nelson D. R., Strader D. B., Thomas D. L., Seeff L. B. An update on treatment of genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C virus infection: 2011 practice guideline by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Hepatol 54:1433–44.

12. Lavanchy D. The global burdgen of hepatitis C. Liver Int 2009; 29 (Suppl 1):74–81.

13. Sarrazin C., Christophe Hezode Ch., Zeuzem S., JeanMichel Pawlotsky J. M. Antiviral strategies in hepatitis C virus infection. Hepatol 2012; 88–100.

14. Sheppard C. W., Finelli L., Alter M. J. Global epidemiology of hepatitis C virus infection. Lancet Infect. Dis 2005; 5:558–67.

15. WHO Drug Information, 2012. 26 (1). International Nonproprietary Names for Pharmaceutical Substances (INN). Recommended INN: List 67. http://www.who. int/medicines/publications/druginformation/issues/ RL67.pdf

16. Yang J. D., Roberts L. R. Hepatocellular carcinoma: a global view. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010; 7:448–58.

17. Yu M. L., Lin S. M., Chuang W. L. et al. A sustained virological response to interferon/ribavirin reduces hepatocellular carcinoma and improves survival in chronic hepatitis C: a nationwide, multicenter study in Taiwan. Antivir Ther 2006; 11:985–94.

18. Zein N. N. The epidemiology and natural history of hepatitis C virus infection. Cleveland Clin J Med 2003; 70 (Suppl 4):S2–6.


Review

For citations:


Mayevskaya M.V., Znoyko O.O., Klimova Ye.A., Maximov S.L., Kizhlo S.N., Petrochenkova N.A., Nagimova F.I., Linkova Yu.N. Treatment of chronic hepatitis C by cepeginterferon alpha-2b in combination to ribavirin. Russian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Coloproctology. 2014;24(2):53-64. (In Russ.)

Views: 117


ISSN 1382-4376 (Print)
ISSN 2658-6673 (Online)