Options of conservative treatment at acute adhesive smallintestinal obstruction
Abstract
Aim of investigation. Improvement of management approach of patients with acute smallintestinal adhesive obstruction (ASIAO) based on choice of method and duration of conservative obstruction treatment.
Material and methods. The study group included 516 patients with obturation form of ASIAO without indications for emergency surgery, who underwent conservative treatment. In 188 patients endoscopic nasointestinal decompression of gastro-intestinal tract was carried out. Due to inefficiency of therapy 269 patients were operated urgently. Original method of treatment efficacy prediction was developed in the clinic. Groups with low, medium and high probability of obstruction resolution were defined.
Results. The group with resolved obturation ASIAO (n=247) average duration of conservative treatment was 11,4±4,8 h. In 92 patients results of conservative treatment prediction were determined at ASIAO (forecast effectiveness was 98,9%).
Conclusions. The differentiated approach to choice of conservative actions and improvement of its terms have allowed to increase treatment response rate of obturation ASIAO to 66,3% and to decrease mortality to 2,2%.
About the Authors
S. G. Shapovalyants
State educational government-financed institution of higher professional education «Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University» (RNRMU) Ministry of healthcare of Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
S. Ye. Larichev
ГБОУ ВПО «Российский национальный исследовательский медицинский университет им. Н.И. Пирогова» Минздрава России
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
M. Ye. Timofeyev
State educational government-financed institution of higher professional education «Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University» (RNRMU) Ministry of healthcare of Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
I. V. Babkova
State educational government-financed institution of higher professional education «Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University» (RNRMU) Ministry of healthcare of Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Z. A. Zhemukhova
State educational government-financed institution of higher professional education «Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University» (RNRMU) Ministry of healthcare of Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
O. I. Seryogina
State educational government-financed institution of higher professional education «Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University» (RNRMU) Ministry of healthcare of Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Алиев С.А. Особенности диагностики и хирургической тактики при спаечной кишечной непроходимости // Хирургия. – 1994. – № 2. – С. 13–17.
2. Андрейцев И.Л. Острая спаечная кишечная непроходимость. Диагностика и лечение: Автореферат. дис. … д-ра мед. наук. – М., 2005. – 43 с.
3. Бебуришвили А.Г., Воробьев А.А., Михин М.В., Попова И.С. // Эндоскопическая хирургия. – 2003. – № 1. – С. 51–63.
4. Белик Б.М. Результаты хирургического лечения больных с острой непроходимостью кишечника: Материалы всероссийского съезда хирургов. – Волгоград, 2000. – 144 с.
5. Дедерер Ю.М. Патогенез и лечение острой непроходимости кишечника. – М.: Медицина, 1971. – 272 с.
6. Ермолов А.С., Лебедев А.Г., Утешев Н.С. О значении кишечной интубации при лечении тонкокишечной непроходимости // Назоинтестинальная интубация в неотложной хирурги: Материалы городского семинара НИИ СП им. Н.В. Склифосовского. – М., 2003. – С. 11.
7. Житарева И.В., Ларичев С.Е., Жемухова З.А., Смирнов И.А. Прогнозирование эффективности консервативной терапии при острой спаечной кишечной непроходимости: Материалы симпозиума «Информационные технологии и общество». – Кемер, Турция, 01–08 октября 2010 г. – С 106–107.
8. Корымасов Е.А., Горбунов Ю.В. Принципы дифференциальной диагностики и тактики при острой кишечной непроходимости // Вестн. хир. им. И.И. Грекова. – 2003. – № 3. – С. 101–106.
9. Кригер А.Г., Андрейцев И.Л., Горский В.А. и др. Диагностика и лечение острой спаечной тонкокишечной непроходимости // Хирургия. – 2001. – № 7. – С. 25–29.
10. Майоров М.И. Клинические аспекты острой кишечной непроходимости: Автореф. дис. … д-ра мед. наук. – М., 2003. – 30 с.
11. Норенберг-Чарквиани А.Е. Острая непроходимость кишечника. – М., 1969. – 373 с.
12. Петров В.П., Ерюхин И.А. Кишечная непроходимость. – М.: Медицина, 1989. – 286 с.
13. Рыбачков В.В., Майоров М.И., Маканов О.А. и др. К оценке лечения острой кишечной непроходимости: Материалы науч.-практ. конф. хирургов РФ «Сложные и нерешенные вопросы диагностики и лечения острого аппендицита, острой кишечной непроходимости и сочетанной травмы», Санкт-Петербург, 2004 г. // Скорая медицинская помощь. – 2004. – № 5. – С. 1–266.
14. Утешев Н.С., Гурчумелидзе Т.П., Романов Л.В., Карасев Н.А. Спаечная тонкокишечная непроходимость у больных пожилого и старческого возраста. Общая и неотложная хирургия: Респ. межведомственный сб. – Киев: Здоров’я, 1990. – Вып. 20. – С. 115–119.
15. Чуприс В.Г. Острая тонкокишечная непроходимость неопухолевого генеза (патогенез, диагностика, лечение): Автореф. дис. … д-ра мед. наук. – СПб, 2009.
16. Шаповальянц С.Г., Ларичев С.Е., Жемухова З.А. и др. Прогнозирование эффективности консервативной терапии при острой спаечной тонкокишечной непроходимости // Рос. журн. гастроэнтерол., гепатол., колопроктол. – 2011. – Т. 21, № 1. – С. 57–62.
17. Abbas S, Bisset IP, Parry BR. Oral water soluble contrast for the management of adhesive small bowel obstruction. Cochrane database of systematic reviews. – 2007; 3:CD004651.
18. Carmichael JC, Mills S. Reoperation for small bowel obstruction – How critical is the timing? Clin Colon Rectal Surg, 2006; 19:181–7.
19. Chen Xiao-Li, Ji Feng, Lin Qi, et al. A prospective randomized trial of transnasal ileus tube vs nasogastric tube for adhesive small bowel obstruction. World J Gastroenterol, 2012 April 28; 18(16):1968–74.
20. Choi HK, Law WL, Ho JW, Chu KW. Value of gastrografin in adhesive small bowel obstruction after unsuccessful conservative treatment: a prospective evaluation. World J Gastroenterol, 2005 Jun 28; 11(24):3742–5.
21. Fevang BT, et al. Complications and death after surgical treatment of small bowel obstruction: a 35-year institutional experience. Ann Surg, 2000; 231:529–37.
22. Fraser SA, Shrier I, Miller G, Gordon PH. Immediate postlaparotomy small bowel obstruction: a 16-year retrospective analysis. Am Surg, 2002 Sep; 68 (9):780–2.
23. Gowen GF. Long tube decompression is successful in 90% of patients with adhesive small bowel obstruction. Am J Surg, 2003; 185:512–5.
24. Guo SB, Duan ZJ. Decompression of the small bowel by endoscopic long-tube placement. World J Gastroenterol, 2012; 18 (15):1822–6.
25. Kössi J, Salminen P, Laato M. The epidemiology and treatment patterns of postoperative adhesion induced intestinal obstruction in Varsinais-Suomi Hospital District. Scand J Surg, 2004; 93 (1):68–72.
26. Kuremu RT, Jumbi G. Adhesive intestinal obstruction. East Afr Med J, 2006 Jun; 83 (6):333–6.
27. Mandalà V, Velmahos GC, Sartelli M, et al. Bologna Guidelines for Diagnosis and Management of Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction (ASBO): 2010 Evidence-Based Guidelines of the World Society of Emergency Surgery. World J Emerg Surg, 2011; 6:5.
28. Markogiannakis H, Messaris E, Dardamanis D, et al. Acute mechanical bowel obstruction: clinical presentation, etiology, management and outcome. World J. Gastroenterol, 2007 Jan 21;13 (3):432–7.
29. Nelson RL, Nyhus LM. A new long intestinal tube. Surg Gynecol Obstet, 1979 Oct; 149 (4):581–2.
30. Sakakibara T, Harada A, Yaguchi T, et al. The indicator for surgery in adhesive small bowel obstruction patient managed with long tube. Hepatogastroenterology, 2007 Apr–May; 54 (75):787–90.
31. Schwab DP, Blackhurst DW, Sticca RP. Operative acute small bowel obstruction: admitting service impacts outcome. Am Surg, 2001 Nov;67 (11):1034–8; discussion 1038–40.
32. Thompson William M, et al. Accuracy of Abdominal Radiography in Acute Small-Bowel Obstruction: Does Reviewer Experience Matter? AJR, 2007; 188:233–8.
33. Van Der Krabben A, Dijkstra FR, Nieuwenhuijzen M, et al. Morbidity and mortality of inadvertent enterotomy during adhesiotomy. Br J Surg, 2000; 87:467–71.
34. Van Goor H. Consequences and complications of peritoneal adhesions. Colorectal Dis, 2007 Oct; 9 suppl 2:25–34.
35. Williams, SB, Greenspon J, Young HA, Orkin BA. Small bowel obstruction: conservative vs. surgical management. Dis Colon Rectum, 2005; 48 (6):1140–6.
Review
For citations:
Shapovalyants S.G., Larichev S.Ye., Timofeyev M.Ye., Babkova I.V., Zhemukhova Z.A., Seryogina O.I. Options of conservative treatment at acute adhesive smallintestinal obstruction. Russian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Coloproctology. 2013;23(5):25-31. (In Russ.)
Views:
85
Email this article 
