Preview

Russian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Coloproctology

Advanced search

Endoscopic Stenting at the Stages of Radical and Palliative Treatment in Patients with Obstructive Colorectal Cancer: Results from a Prospective Randomized Trial

https://doi.org/10.22416/1382-4376-2026-36-3-99-110

Abstract

Aim: to compare the effectiveness and oncological safety of colon preparation for surgical treatment in patients with colorectal cancer complicated with obstructive colonic ileus using endoscopic stenting and protective ostomy.

Materials and methods. A prospective, single-center, randomized study was carried out. All patients with colorectal cancer complicated with obstructive colonic ileus consecutively admitted to the Proctology Clinic of the University Clinical Hospital No. 2 of the Sechenov University were included in the study. Patients were randomized into two groups: Group 1 (study group) included patients who underwent endoscopic placement of a self-expanding metal stent to resolve obstructive colonic ileus; Group 2 (control group) included patients who underwent protective ostomy.

Results. Endoscopic stenting requires less general anesthesia and can be performed outside the operating room. The duration of decompression surgery is statistically significantly shorter with stenting compared to ostomy: 23 [20–30] and 50 [40–60] min, respectively (p < 0.001). The rehabilitation period, which is also the period of preparation for the main surgical intervention, with stenting was 4 [3–5] days, which was statistically significantly shorter compared to the control group (p < 0.001). Satisfactory quality of colon preparation after decompression in the study group was noted in 92.9 % of cases, in the control group — in 50 % of cases (p < 0.001). The result of nutritional correction in both groups was assessed as positive, however, in intergroup comparison, the level of serum albumin was statistically significantly higher in the group of stented patients (p = 0.015). The duration of the main surgery was statistically significantly longer in the ostomy group than in the study group: 300 [270–320] vs. 180 [160–220] min, respectively (p < 0.001). The results of the data indicating the oncological safety of both decompression methods were similar.

Conclusion. Endoscopic stenting of tumor stenosis in obstructive colonic ileus may be considered a preferable option for preoperative colon decompression compared to unloading stoma in the treatment of complicated forms of colorectal cancer within a single hospitalization.

About the Authors

I. E. Gorovaia
I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
Russian Federation

Irina E. Gorovaia* — Teaching Assistant of the Department of Surgery of N.V. Sklifosovsky Institute of Clinical Medicine, Clinic of Coloproctology and Minimally Invasive Surgery

119435, Moscow, Pogodinskaya str., 1, build. 1



P. V. Tsarkov
I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
Russian Federation

Petr V. Tsarkov — Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor, Head of the Department of Surgery of N.V. Sklifosovsky Institute of Clinical Medicine, Head of the Clinic of Coloproctology and Minimally Invasive Surgery

119435, Moscow, Pogodinskaya str., 1, build. 1



P. V. Pavlov
I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
Russian Federation

Pavel V. Pavlov — Cand. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor of the Department of Surgery of N.V. Sklifosovsky Institute of Clinical Medicine; Endoscopist of the Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Endoscopy

119435, Moscow, Pogodinskaya str., 1, build. 1



V. I. Zhurkovskiy
I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
Russian Federation

Victor I. Zhurkovskiy — Cand. Sci. (Med.), Teaching Assistant of the Department of Surgery of N.V. Sklifosovsky Institute of Clinical Medicine, Clinic of Coloproctology and Minimally Invasive Surgery

119435, Moscow, Pogodinskaya str., 1, build. 1



V. M. Nekoval
I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
Russian Federation

Valery M. Nekoval — Cand. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor of the Department of Surgery of N.V. Sklifosovsky Institute of Clinical Medicine, Clinic of Coloproctology and Minimally Invasive Surgery

119435, Moscow, Pogodinskaya str., 1, build. 1



D. D. Kyrmygenova
I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
Russian Federation

Daria D. Kyrmygenova — Clinical Resident of the Department of Surgery of N.V. Sklifosovsky Institute of Clinical Medicine, Clinic of Coloproctology and Minimally Invasive Surgery

119435, Moscow, Pogodinskaya str., 1, build. 1



V. D. Kim
I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
Russian Federation

Valeriia D. Kim — Student of the Department of Surgery of N.V. Sklifosovsky Institute of Clinical Medicine, Clinic of Coloproctology and Minimally Invasive Surgery

119435, Moscow, Pogodinskaya str., 1, build. 1



References

1. Cheynel N., Cortet M., Lepage C., Benoit L., Faivre J., Bouvier A.M. Trends in frequency and management of obstructing colorectal cancers in a well-defined population. Dis Colon Rectum. 2007;50(10):1568–75. DOI: 10.1007/s10350-007-9007-4

2. Mu C., Chen L. A retrospective evaluation of short-term results from colonic stenting as a bridge to elective surgery versus emergency surgery for malignant colonic obstruction. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):1600. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-28685-y

3. Cheynel N., Cortet M., Lepage C., Ortega-Debalon P., Faivre J., Bouvier A.M. Incidence, patterns of failure, and prognosis of perforated colorectal cancers in a well-defined population. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52(3):406–11. DOI: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e318197e351

4. Yeo H.L., Lee S.W. Colorectal emergencies: Review and controversies in the management of large bowel obstruction. J Gastrointest Surg. 2013;17(11):2007–12. DOI: 10.1007/s11605-013-2343-x

5. Tekkis P.P., Kinsman R., Thompson M.R., Stamatakis J.D.; Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain, Ireland. The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland study of large bowel obstruction caused by colorectal cancer. Ann Surg. 2004;240(1):76–81. DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000130723.81866.75

6. Deans G.T., Krukowski Z.H., Irwin S.T. Malignant obstruction of the left colon. Br J Surg. 1994;81(9):1270–6. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800810905

7. Pecqueux M., Distler M., Radulova-Mauersberger O., Neckmann U., Korn S., Praetorius C., et al. COMPASS: deCOMPressingstomA and two-Stage elective resection vs. emergency reSection in patients with left-sided obstructive colon cancer. Trials. 2023;24(1):641. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07636-y

8. Tamim W.Z., Ghellai A., Counihan T.C., Swanson R.S., Colby J.M., Sweeney W.B. Experience with endoluminal colonic wall stents for the management of large bowel obstruction for benign and malignant disease. Arch Surg. 2000;135(4):434–8. DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.135.4.434

9. Zhang T., Wang G., Fang G., Qiu L., Lu F., Yin K., et al. Clinical efficacy of anastomotic reinforcement suture in preventing anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023;408(1):322. DOI: 10.1007/s00423-02303058-1

10. Hanaoka M., Ogo T., Kawamura Y., Miura T., Aburatani T., Sugimoto H., et al. Self-expandable metal stent as a bridge to surgery for colorectal cancer: Safety and oncological outcomes. In Vivo. 2020;34(3):1325–31. DOI: 10.21873/invivo.11909

11. Shang R., Han X., Zeng C., Lv F., Fang R., Tian X., et al. Colonic stent as a bridge to surgery versus emergency rection for malignant left-sided colorectal obstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Medicine (Baltimore). 2023;102(50):e36078. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000036078

12. Spannenburg L., Sanchez Gonzalez M., Brooks A., Wei S., Li X., Liang X., et al. Surgical outcomes of colonic stents as a bridge to surgery versus emergency surgery for malignant colorectal obstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of high quality prospective and randomised controlled trials. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020;46(8):1404–14. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.04.052

13. Yamada T., Matsuda A., Takahashi G., Yoshida H. Oncological risk of colonic stents used as bridge to surgery for left-side malignant colonic obstructions. Ann Surg Oncol. 2022;29(5):2759–60. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-11274-6

14. Kim B.G., Gao M.Q., Kang S., Choi Y.P., Lee J.H., Kim J.E., et al. Mechanical compression induces VEGFA overexpression in breast cancer via DNMT3A-dependent miR-9 downregulation. Cell Death Dis. 2017;8(3):e2646. DOI: 10.1038/cddis.2017.73

15. van Hooft J.E., Veld J.V., Arnold D., Beets-Tan R.G.H., Everett S., Götz M., et al. Self-expandable metal stents for obstructing colonic and extracolonic cancer: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline — update 2020. Endoscopy. 2020;52(5):389–407. DOI: 10.1055/a-1140-3017

16. Spinelli P., Dal Fante M., Mancini A. Self-expanding mesh stent for endoscopic palliation of rectal obstructing tumors: A preliminary report. Surg Endosc. 1992;6(2):72–4. DOI: 10.1007/BF02281084

17. Song H.Y., Kim J.H., Shin J.H., Kim H.C., Yu C.S., Kim J.C., et al. A dual-design expandable colorectal stent for malignant colorectal obstruction: Results of a multicenter study. Endoscopy. 2007;39(5):448–54. DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-966270

18. Ho M.F., Futaba K., Chu S., Hon S.S., Ng S.S. Delaying surgery for optimization after colonic stent bridging is safe for left-sided malignant large bowel obstruction: Result from 10-year experience and risks factor analysis. Surg Oncol. 2023;47:101918. DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2023.101918

19. Fernández-Esparrach G., Bordas J.M., Giráldez M.D., Ginès A., Pellisé M., Sendino O., et al. Severe complications limit long-term clinical success of self-expanding metal stents in patients with obstructive colorectal cancer. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105(5):1087–93. DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2009.660

20. Sebastian S., Johnston S., Geoghegan T., Torreggiani W., Buckley M. Pooled analysis of the efficacy and safety of self-expanding metal stenting in malignant colorectal obstruction. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99(10):2051–7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.40017.x

21. Lueders A., Ong G., Davis P., Weyerbacher J., Saxe J. Colonic stenting for malignant obstructions — A review of current indications and outcomes. Am J Surg. 2022;224(1 Pt A): 217–27. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.12.034

22. Tamini N., Ceresoli M., Aldè S., Carissimi F., Ripamonti L., Nespoli L., et al. Quasi-elective left colectomy after endoscopic colon stenting for obstructive cancer yields comparable oncologic outcome to full-elective operation. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2020;35(4):633–40. DOI: 10.1007/s00384-020-03519-9

23. CReST Collaborative Group. Colorectal Endoscopic Stenting Trial (CReST) for obstructing left-sided colorectal cancer: Randomized clinical trial. Br J Surg. 2022;109(11):1073–80. DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znac141

24. Gavriilidis P., de'Angelis N., Wheeler J., Askari A., Di Saverio S., Davies J.R. Diversion, resection, or stenting as a bridge to surgery for acute neoplastic left-sided colonic obstruction: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of studies with curative intent. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2021;103(4):235–44. DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2020.7137

25. Tan L., Liu Z.L., Ran M.N., Tang L.H., Pu Y.J., Liu Y.L., et al. Comparison of the prognosis of four different treatment strategies for acute left malignant colonic obstruction: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. World J Emerg Surg. 2021;16(1):11. DOI: 10.1186/ s13017-021-00355-2

26. Amelung F.J., Burghgraef T.A., Tanis P.J., van Hooft J.E., Ter Borg F., Siersema P.D., et al. Critical appraisal of oncological safety of stent as bridge to surgery in left-sided obstructing colon cancer; a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2018;131:66–75. DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2018.08.003

27. Marcuello M., Vymetalkova V., Neves R.P.L., DuranSanchon S., Vedeld H.M., Tham E., et al. Circulating biomarkers for early detection and clinical management of colorectal cancer. Mol Aspects Med. 2019;69:107–22. DOI: 10.1016/j.mam.2019.06.002

28. Yamashita S., Tanemura M., Sawada G., Moon J., Shimizu Y., Yamaguchi T., et al. Impact of endoscopic stent insertion on detection of viable circulating tumor cells from obstructive colorectal cancer. Oncol Lett. 2018;15(1):400–6. DOI: 10.3892/ol.2017.7339

29. Cao K., Wang Z.J., Han J.G. Treatment of obstructive colorectal cancer. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2023;26(1):44–50. (In Chinese). DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20221114-00465

30. Ni Z., Cao Y., Liu L., Huang C., Xie H., Zhou J., et al. Impact of endoscopic metallic stent placement and emergency surgery on detection of viable circulating tumor cells for acute malignant left-sided colonic obstruction. World J Surg Oncol. 2023;21(1):1. DOI: 10.1186/s12957-022-02879-6

31. Ferrada P., Patel M.B., Poylin V., Bruns B.R., Leichtle S.W., Wydo S., et al. Surgery or stenting for colonic obstruction: A practice management guideline from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016;80(4):659–64. DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000966


Review

For citations:


Gorovaia I.E., Tsarkov P.V., Pavlov P.V., Zhurkovskiy V.I., Nekoval V.M., Kyrmygenova D.D., Kim V.D. Endoscopic Stenting at the Stages of Radical and Palliative Treatment in Patients with Obstructive Colorectal Cancer: Results from a Prospective Randomized Trial. Russian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Coloproctology. 2026;36(3):99-110. https://doi.org/10.22416/1382-4376-2026-36-3-99-110

Views: 60

JATS XML

ISSN 1382-4376 (Print)
ISSN 2658-6673 (Online)