Results of formation of primary and secondary smallintestinal reservoirs at ulcerative colitis
Abstract
Aim of investigation. Improvement of results of surgical treatment and quality of life of patients with severe forms of ulcerative colitis.
Material and methods. Investigation is based on analysis of results of surgery of 123 ulcerative colitis patients operated in coloproctology center of Ministry of Health of Russia in 2007 to 2013, that was completed by reconstructive — plastic stage. Formation of smallintestinal reservoir in one stage with total resection of large intestine was carried out in 46 (37,4%) patients (the first group) and secondary, remote — in 77 (62,6%, the second group).
Results. At analysis of complication types it was revealed, that complications related to stapling device prevailed in groups. At the present moment of 123 patients who have underwent surgical treatment with formation of smallintestinal reservoir, in 101 (82,1%) ileostoma was liquidated. Of them in the first group it has been closed in 31 (67,4%) patient, in the second — in 70 (90,1%). Thus only in 2 (4,3%) patients of the first and in 1 (1,2%) patient of the second group with developed postoperative complications closure of imposed ileostoma was not performed.
Conclusions. Today formation of smallintestinal reservoirs is unique way of rehabilitation of patients with ulcerative colitis after total colectomy. Comparable results of treatment in analyzed groups have been received due to refusal of primary reservoir formation in patients with more severe course of disease and more intensive and long-term steroid therapy.
About the Authors
V. N. KashnikovRussian Federation
S. I. Achkasov
Russian Federation
K. V. Bolikhov
Russian Federation
O. I. Sushkov
Russian Federation
I. V. Nazarov
Russian Federation
A. V. Gusev
Russian Federation
References
1. Кайзер А.М. Колоректальная хирургия / Под ред. Ю.А. Шелыгиной. М., 2011.
2. Alves A., Panis Y., Bouhnik Y., et al. Subtotal colectomy for severe acute colitis: a 20-year experience of a tertiary care center with an aggressive and early surgical policy. J Am Coll Surg 2003; 197(3):379-85.
3. Caitlin W., Hodin R., Bordeianou L. Possible overuse of 3-stage procedures for active ulcerative colitis. JAMA Surg 2013;148(7):658-64. doi:10.1001/2013.jamasurg.325
4. Carlstedt A., Fasth S., Hulten L., Nordgren S., Palselius I. Long-term ileostomy complications in patients with ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease. Int J Colorectal Dis 1987; 2:22-5.
5. Fazio V.W., Coffey J.C., Heneghan H.M., et al. Ileal pouch anal anastomosis analysis of outcome and quality of life in 3707 patients. Ann Surg 2013; 257(4):679-85.
6. Gorfine S.R., Harris M.T., Bub D.S., Bauer J.J. Restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis complicated by colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 2004; 47:1377-85.
7. Hahnloser D., Pemberton J.H., Wolff B.G., Larson D.R., Crownhart B.S., Dozois R.R. The effect of ageing on function and quality of life in ileal pouch patients: a single cohort experience of 409 patients with chronic ulcerative colitis. Ann Surg 2004; 240:615-21.
8. Michelassi F., Lee J., Rubin M., et al. Long-term functional results after ileal pouch anal restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis: a prospective observational study. Ann Surg 2003; 238:433-41.
9. Richards D.M., Hughes S.A., Irving M.H., Scott N.A. Patient quality of life after successful restorative proctocolectomy is normal. Colorectal Dis 2001; 3:223-6.
10. Udo A., Erik H., et al. One or two-stage procedure for restorative proctocolectomy: Rationale for a surgical strategy in ulcerative colitis. Ann Surg 2001; 234(6):78894.
Review
For citations:
Kashnikov V.N., Achkasov S.I., Bolikhov K.V., Sushkov O.I., Nazarov I.V., Gusev A.V. Results of formation of primary and secondary smallintestinal reservoirs at ulcerative colitis. Russian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Coloproctology. 2014;24(6):73-77. (In Russ.)